Decremental Optimization of Dominating Sets Under the Reconfiguration Framework

Given a dominating set, how much smaller a dominating set can we find through elementary operations? Here, we proceed by iterative vertex addition and removal while maintaining the property that the set forms a dominating set of bounded size. This can be seen as the optimization variant of the dominating set reconfiguration problem, where two dominating sets are given and the question is merely whether they can be reached from one another through elementary operations. We show that this problem is PSPACE-complete, even if the input graph is a bipartite graph, a split graph, or has bounded pathwidth. On the positive side, we give linear-time algorithms for cographs, trees and interval graphs. We also study the parameterized complexity of this problem. More precisely, we show that the problem is W[2]-hard when parameterized by the upper bound on the size of an intermediary dominating set. On the other hand, we give fixed-parameter algorithms with respect to the minimum size of a vertex cover, or \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$d+s$$\end{document} where d is the degeneracy and s is the upper bound of the output solution.

[1]  Naomi Nishimura,et al.  On the Parameterized Complexity of Reconfiguration Problems , 2013, Algorithmica.

[2]  Erik D. Demaine,et al.  PSPACE-completeness of sliding-block puzzles and other problems through the nondeterministic constraint logic model of computation , 2002, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Takehiro Ito,et al.  The complexity of dominating set reconfiguration , 2015, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Martin Milanic,et al.  Complexity of independent set reconfigurability problems , 2012, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Noga Alon,et al.  Linear Time Algorithms for Finding a Dominating Set of Fixed Size in Degenerated Graphs , 2007, Algorithmica.

[6]  Takehiro Ito,et al.  Incremental optimization of independent sets under the reconfiguration framework , 2019, Journal of Combinatorial Optimization.

[7]  Ge Xia,et al.  Improved upper bounds for vertex cover , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[9]  Takehiro Ito,et al.  On the complexity of reconfiguration problems , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Alan A. Bertossi,et al.  Dominating Sets for Split and Bipartite Graphs , 1984, Inf. Process. Lett..

[11]  Stephan Kreutzer,et al.  Kernelization and Sparseness: the case of Dominating Set , 2014, STACS.

[12]  Amer E. Mouawad,et al.  The complexity of independent set reconfiguration on bipartite graphs , 2018, SODA.

[13]  Jan van den Heuvel,et al.  The complexity of change , 2013, Surveys in Combinatorics.

[14]  Fahad Panolan,et al.  Reconfiguration on Sparse Graphs , 2015, WADS.

[15]  Naomi Nishimura,et al.  Reconfiguration of dominating sets , 2014, J. Comb. Optim..

[16]  Naomi Nishimura,et al.  Introduction to Reconfiguration , 2018, Algorithms.

[17]  Michael R. Fellows,et al.  Parameterized Complexity , 1998 .

[18]  Naomi Nishimura,et al.  Vertex Cover Reconfiguration and Beyond , 2014, ISAAC.

[19]  Takehiro Ito,et al.  Incremental Optimization of Independent Sets under Reachability Constraints , 2018, ArXiv.

[20]  Marthe Bonamy,et al.  Token Sliding on Chordal Graphs , 2016, WG.