Attenuating noise from computed tomography medical images using a coefficients‐driven total variation denoising algorithm

The aim of image denoising is to recover a visually accepted image from its noisy observation with as much detail as possible. The noise exists in computed tomography images due to hardware errors, software faults and/or low radiation dose. Because of noise, the analysis and extraction of accurate medical information is a challenging task for specialists. Therefore, a novel modification on the total variational denoising algorithm is proposed in this article to attenuate the noise from CT images and provide a better visual quality. The newly developed algorithm can properly detect noise from the other image components using four new noise distinguishing coefficients and reduce it using a novel minimization function. Moreover, the proposed algorithm has a fast computation speed, a simple structure, a relatively low computational cost and preserves the small image details while reducing the noise efficiently. Evaluating the performance of the proposed algorithm is achieved through the use of synthetic and real noisy images. Likewise, the synthetic images are appraised by three advanced accuracy methods –Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation (GMSD), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Weighted Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio (WSNR). The empirical results exhibited significant improvement not only in noise reduction but also in preserving the minor image details. Finally, the proposed algorithm provided satisfying results that outperformed all the comparative methods.

[1]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Breast volume denoising and noise characterization by 3D wavelet transform. , 2004, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[2]  M. L. Dewal,et al.  Efficient Denoising Technique for CT images to Enhance Brain Hemorrhage Segmentation , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  採編典藏組 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics(SIAM) , 2008 .

[4]  Yue Wu,et al.  James–Stein Type Center Pixel Weights for Non-Local Means Image Denoising , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Jochen Hiller,et al.  A study on evaluation strategies in dimensional X-ray computed tomography by estimation of measurement uncertainties , 2012 .

[6]  Tuan D. Pham,et al.  Supervised restoration of degraded medical images using multiple-point geostatistics , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  Ibrahim M. Eldokany,et al.  CURVELET FUSION OF MR AND CT IMAGES , 2008 .

[8]  Ilker Bayram,et al.  Directional Total Variation , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  Hao Wu,et al.  Fast CT Image Processing Using Parallelized Non-local Means , 2011 .

[10]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Syed Amjad Ali,et al.  An Efficient Denoising Technique for CT Images using Window- based Multi-Wavelet Transformation and Thresholding , 2010 .

[12]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Local noise weighted filtering for emphysema scoring of low-dose CT images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  M. Nikolova An Algorithm for Total Variation Minimization and Applications , 2004 .

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Modeling and quality assessment of halftoning by error diffusion , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  Jacques A. de Guise,et al.  A method for modeling noise in medical images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Malcolm Atkinson,et al.  Computed tomography perfusion imaging denoising using Gaussian process regression , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Lionel Moisan,et al.  Total Variation as a Local Filter , 2011, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[18]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  M. L. Dewal,et al.  Medical image denoising using adaptive fusion of curvelet transform and total variation , 2013, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[20]  Filippo Attivissimo,et al.  A Technique to Improve the Image Quality in Computer Tomography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[21]  Jin Zhang,et al.  Neural Network Blind Equalization Algorithm Applied in Medical CT Image Restoration , 2013 .

[22]  Filippo Attivissimo,et al.  A statistical approach for MR and CT images comparison , 2013 .

[23]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[24]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis - variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods , 2005 .

[25]  A. Chambolle Practical, Unified, Motion and Missing Data Treatment in Degraded Video , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[26]  Qianjin Feng,et al.  Improving low-dose abdominal CT images by Weighted Intensity Averaging over Large-scale Neighborhoods. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[27]  Huy,et al.  An Optimal Weight Method for CT Image Denoising , 2012 .

[28]  Pascal Getreuer,et al.  Rudin-Osher-Fatemi Total Variation Denoising using Split Bregman , 2012, Image Process. Line.

[29]  Zhiwu Liao Low-Dosed X-Ray Computed Tomography Imaging by Regularized Fully Spatial Fractional-Order Perona-Malik Diffusion , 2013 .

[30]  João M. Sanches,et al.  Medical Image Noise Reduction Using the Sylvester–Lyapunov Equation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  Maryam Khanian,et al.  An Optimal Partial Differential Equations-based Stopping Criterion for Medical Image Denoising , 2014, Journal of medical signals and sensors.

[32]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[33]  Yue Wu,et al.  Probabilistic Non-Local Means , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[34]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Image denoising using SVM classification in nonsubsampled contourlet transform domain , 2013, Inf. Sci..