Impaired Feedforward Control and Enhanced Feedback Control of Speech in Patients with Cerebellar Degeneration

The cerebellum has been hypothesized to form a crucial part of the speech motor control network. Evidence for this comes from patients with cerebellar damage, who exhibit a variety of speech deficits, as well as imaging studies showing cerebellar activation during speech production in healthy individuals. To date, the precise role of the cerebellum in speech motor control remains unclear, as it has been implicated in both anticipatory (feedforward) and reactive (feedback) control. Here, we assess both anticipatory and reactive aspects of speech motor control, comparing the performance of patients with cerebellar degeneration and matched controls. Experiment 1 tested feedforward control by examining speech adaptation across trials in response to a consistent perturbation of auditory feedback. Experiment 2 tested feedback control, examining online corrections in response to inconsistent perturbations of auditory feedback. Both male and female patients and controls were tested. The patients were impaired in adapting their feedforward control system relative to controls, exhibiting an attenuated anticipatory response to the perturbation. In contrast, the patients produced even larger compensatory responses than controls, suggesting an increased reliance on sensory feedback to guide speech articulation in this population. Together, these results suggest that the cerebellum is crucial for maintaining accurate feedforward control of speech, but relatively uninvolved in feedback control. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Speech motor control is a complex activity that is thought to rely on both predictive, feedforward control as well as reactive, feedback control. While the cerebellum has been shown to be part of the speech motor control network, its functional contribution to feedback and feedforward control remains controversial. Here, we use real-time auditory perturbations of speech to show that patients with cerebellar degeneration are impaired in adapting feedforward control of speech but retain the ability to make online feedback corrections; indeed, the patients show an increased sensitivity to feedback. These results indicate that the cerebellum forms a crucial part of the feedforward control system for speech but is not essential for online, feedback control.

[1]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Size of error affects cerebellar contributions to motor learning. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Allison M Okamura,et al.  Cerebellar motor learning: are environment dynamics more important than error size? , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Weak Responses to Auditory Feedback Perturbation during Articulation in Persons Who Stutter: Evidence for Abnormal Auditory-Motor Transformation , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Kevin G Munhall,et al.  Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: evidence from real-time formant manipulation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Krakauer,et al.  A computational neuroanatomy for motor control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Russell Lenth,et al.  Least-Squares Means , 2016 .

[8]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  A neuroimaging study of premotor lateralization and cerebellar involvement in the production of phonemes and syllables. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  R. Ivry,et al.  Cerebellar and prefrontal cortex contributions to adaptation, strategies, and reinforcement learning. , 2014, Progress in brain research.

[10]  G. Bennett,et al.  The assessment. , 1989, Health visitor.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. , 1998, Science.

[12]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning , 2014, Science.

[13]  Jason A. Tourville,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  K. Munhall,et al.  Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Sarah E. Criscimagna-Hemminger,et al.  Cerebellar Contributions to Reach Adaptation and Learning Sensory Consequences of Action , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  S. M. Morton,et al.  Cerebellar Contributions to Locomotor Adaptations during Splitbelt Treadmill Walking , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Ostry,et al.  Somatosensory basis of speech production , 2003, Nature.

[18]  John E. Schlerf,et al.  Individuals with cerebellar degeneration show similar adaptation deficits with large and small visuomotor errors. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Thomas F. Quatieri,et al.  Speech transformations based on a sinusoidal representation , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[21]  R. Ivry,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences the Role of Strategies in Motor Learning , 2022 .

[22]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Matthew J. Crossley,et al.  Savings upon Re-Aiming in Visuomotor Adaptation , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  D B Pisoni,et al.  An addendum to "Effects of Noise on Speech Production: Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928 (1988)]. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Hermann Ackermann,et al.  Cerebellar contributions to speech production and speech perception: psycholinguistic and neurobiological perspectives , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech , 2011, NeuroImage.

[29]  Ewen N. MacDonald,et al.  Formant compensation for auditory feedback with English vowels. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Perkell,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Partial Compensation for Altered Auditory Feedback: A Tradeoff with Somatosensory Feedback? , 2012, Language and speech.

[33]  D. Ostry,et al.  Nonhomogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  A. Bastian Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[37]  A Smith,et al.  On the assessment of stability and patterning of speech movements. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[38]  Krista M Bond,et al.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[41]  Hermann Ackermann,et al.  The contribution of the cerebellum to speech production and speech perception: Clinical and functional imaging data , 2008, The Cerebellum.

[42]  C. Larson,et al.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Daniel R. Lametti,et al.  Sensory Preference in Speech Production Revealed by Simultaneous Alteration of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  F. Guenther,et al.  Vowel Category Boundaries Enhance Cortical and Behavioral Responses to Speech Feedback Alterations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Consensus Paper: Roles of the Cerebellum in Motor Control—The Diversity of Ideas on Cerebellar Involvement in Movement , 2011, The Cerebellum.

[47]  B. Day,et al.  Influence of vision on upper limb reaching movements in patients with cerebellar ataxia. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[49]  Frank H Guenther,et al.  The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.