Post Cesarean Section Pelvic Abscess: Case-Control Study And Lessons Learned Following An Outbreak At A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Objectives: To study the risk factors for pelvic abscess following cesarean section. Design: Case-control study with two-tailed univariate analysis of potential risk factors and multiple logistic regression to test the combined effects of these risk factors. Setting: Tertiary care teaching hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Participants: 21 women with pelvic abscess following cesarean section and 21 matched controls who underwent cesarean section during the same time period but experienced no known surgical site infections. Risk factors considered: Body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension, type of cesarean section (elective vs. emergency), number of previous cesarean sections, allocation to labor and delivery ward, timing of rupture of the membrane, antibiotic prophylaxis, and number of per-vaginal examinations before cesarean section. Results: All risk factors except hypertension and antibiotic prophylaxis were significant (p between 0.0001-0.05 based on Chisquare test) in the univariate analysis. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the number of vaginal examinations (19/21 in cases vs. 11/21 in controls, odds ratio (OR) 8.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-46.8, p = 0.01 based on student T test) and emergency cesarean section (17/21 vs. 9/21, OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.41-22.8, p = 0.01) resulted in the highest odds ratios, although allocation to the labor and delivery ward emerged as the statistically most significant risk factor (21/21 vs. 11/21, OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.27-2.87, p = 0.0001) Conclusions: Identification of the main risk factors will help prioritize appropriate infection control measures to those at highest risk of pelvic abscess following cesarean section

[1]  T. Kenri,et al.  Pelvic abscess due to Mycoplasma hominis following caesarean section , 2016, JMM case reports.

[2]  Ommega Internationals,et al.  Pelvic Abscess with Uterine Wound Dehiscence Post Cesarean Section, Rare Presentation with Modified Management: Case Report & Literature Review , 2016 .

[3]  Asmita T. Kamble,et al.  Surgical site infection rates in six cities of India: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). , 2015, International health.

[4]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.

[5]  D. Muin,et al.  Severe pelvic abscess formation following caesarean section , 2015, BMJ Case Reports.

[6]  Tania Revolus,et al.  Implementation of Evidence-Based Innovative Bundle Checklist for Reduction of Surgical Site Infection , 2014 .

[7]  J. M. Badia,et al.  Prevention of surgical site infection in abdominal surgery. A critical review of the evidence , 2014 .

[8]  G. Sharma,et al.  Retained Foreign Bodies: A Serious Threat in the Indian Operation Room , 2014, Annals of medical and health sciences research.

[9]  B. Young,et al.  Timing of antibiotic administration and infectious morbidity following cesarean delivery: incorporating policy change into workflow , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  G. Gyte,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  N. Uldbjerg,et al.  Risk of selected postpartum infections after cesarean section compared with vaginal birth: A five‐year cohort study of 32,468 women , 2009, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  Kenichi Tanaka,et al.  Abscess formation due to Mycoplasma hominis infection after cesarean section , 2009, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[13]  J. Alcázar,et al.  Two-dimensional power Doppler-three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of a cesarean section dehiscence with utero-peritoneal fistula: a case report , 2009, Journal of medical case reports.

[14]  H. Rüden,et al.  [Responsibility of surgeons for surgical site infections]. , 2006, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[15]  F. Patacchiola,et al.  [Antibiotic prophylaxis of infective complications after cesarean section. Our experience]. , 2000, Minerva ginecologica.

[16]  W. Wang,et al.  Rapid diagnosis and treatment of post‐Cesarean parametrial abscess by transabdominal ultrasound‐guided needle aspiration , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  M. Bay-Nielsen [Risk factors of surgical wound infection]. , 1996, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[18]  S. Apter,et al.  CT of pelvic infection after cesarean section. , 1992, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[19]  C. de’Sperati,et al.  [Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric surgery. Experience with a sulbactam-ampicillin combination]. , 1991, Minerva ginecologica.

[20]  B. Gruendemann Surgical asepsis revisited. , 1990, Today's OR nurse.

[21]  F. Tomaselli,et al.  [Antibiotic prophylaxis in non-elective cesarean section with single-dose imipenem versus multiple-dose cefotaxime]. , 1989, Rivista europea per le scienze mediche e farmacologiche = European review for medical and pharmacological sciences = Revue europeenne pour les sciences medicales et pharmacologiques.

[22]  N. Gleicher,et al.  Abscess formation post cesarean section due to a piece of latex glove , 1987, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[23]  D. Quade,et al.  The SENIC Project. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC Project). Summary of study design. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  W. Beck Surveillance versus epidemiologic study of nosocomial infection. , 1974, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.