Controllability and energy efficiency of a high-purity divided wall column

The divided wall column system is a promising energy-saving alternative for separating multi-component mixtures. However, high energy efficiency and stable operations can only be achieved with careful design of steady state operation and control scheme. In this study, the effects of liquid split and vapor split ratios on the energy efficiency and controllability of a divided wall column system for separating ethanol, n-propanol, and n-butanol were investigated. A region with high energy efficiency was identified. However, relative gain analysis found that the performance of multi-loops composition control would be very poor. Dynamic tests showed that multi-loop temperature control cannot return the product compositions to the desired values in case of feed composition disturbances. Outside this region, composition control can compensate for external disturbances such as feed flow rate and feed composition changes but not changes in operating region caused by internal variations such as liquid and vapor splits. Offsets in the product purities were found if temperature controls were used and there are disturbances in feed composition or changes in operating region caused by upsets in liquid and vapor splits. There is a trade-off between energy efficiency and controllability. A composition + temperature cascade scheme was proposed to stabilize the operation with high energy efficiency. The proposed scheme was able to maintain high product purity and reject external disturbances in feed flow and composition changes as well as internal disturbances such as changes in liquid and vapor splits.

[1]  R. Agrawal,et al.  Are Thermally Coupled Distillation Columns Always Thermodynamically More Efficient for Ternary Distillations , 1998 .

[2]  Shih‐Haur Shen,et al.  Use of relay‐feedback test for automatic tuning of multivariable systems , 1994 .

[3]  P. Mizsey,et al.  Energy savings of integrated and coupled distillation systems , 1999 .

[4]  Michael F. Malone.  Optimality Regions for Complex Column Alternatives in Distillation Systems , 1988 .

[5]  Robin Smith,et al.  Operation and Control of Dividing Wall Distillation Columns: Part 2: Simulation and Pilot Plant Studies Using Temperature Control , 1998 .

[6]  Hans Becker,et al.  Partitioned Distillation Columns -- Why, When & How , 2001 .

[7]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Derivation of transfer functions for highly nonlinear distillation columns , 1987 .

[8]  Arturo Jiménez,et al.  Controllability Analysis of Thermally Coupled Distillation Systems , 1999 .

[9]  Michael A. Schultz,et al.  Reduce Costs with Dividing-Wall Columns , 2002 .

[10]  Peter Mizsey,et al.  Rigorous Comparative Study of Energy-Integrated Distillation Schemes , 1996 .

[11]  C. Triantafyllou,et al.  The design and optimisation of fully thermally coupled distillation columns : Process design , 1992 .

[12]  L. Puigjaner,et al.  Controllability of different multicomponent distillation arrangements , 2003 .

[13]  Hartmut Schoenmakers,et al.  Model predictive control of integrated unit operations: Control of a divided wall column , 2004 .

[14]  C. Pantelides,et al.  Optimal design of thermally coupled distillation columns , 1999 .

[15]  Dale F. Rudd,et al.  Parametric studies in industrial distillation: Part I. Design comparisons , 1978 .

[16]  M. Emtir,et al.  Rigorous simulation of energy integrated and thermally coupled distillation schemes for ternary mixture , 2001 .

[17]  Robin Smith,et al.  Operation and Control of Dividing Wall Distillation Columns: Part 1: Degrees of Freedom and Dynamic Simulation , 1998 .

[18]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Operation of Integrated Three-Product (Petlyuk) Distillation Columns , 1995 .

[19]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Shortcut Analysis of Optimal Operation of Petlyuk Distillation , 2004 .