IntroductionOver the last 30 years, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, which provides federally funded income support for individuals with disabilities, has become one of the most important means-tested cash aid programs in the United States. In 2015, SSI provided payments to 4.9 million low-income adults aged 18-64 who met its disability criteria (Social Security Administration [SSA] 2017a, Table 7.A1). That figure represents a doubling in the adult SSI caseload since 1990 (Chart 1). The federal government spent $46.9 billion on payments to SSI recipients with disabilities in 2015 (SSA 2017a, Table 7.A4), representing a 155 percent increase in real dollars since 1990.1Because SSI is a means-tested program, one might expect application trends to be countercyclical-decreasing when the economy is expanding and increasing during recessions. However, the cyclicality of application has varied over time. Chart 2 graphs SSI applications for adults aged 18-64 (leftaxis) against the unemployment rate (right axis) for 1990-2015. For most of the period-from 1990 through about 2002 and from 2008 to 2015-the trend in SSI application followed the trend in the national unemployment rate fairly closely. For example, the steady decline in SSI application in the 1990s began about 1 year after the unemployment rate began to decline; SSI application increased as unemployment rates rose during the Great Recession of 2008-2010 and application declined during the subsequent recovery. However, the 2003-2007 period presents an anomaly: Although the unemployment rate fell, SSI application continued to rise. Rutledge and Wu (2014) offer a number of explanations for the continuing rise in applications during that period, including the lagged effects of prior welfare reforms that induced Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program participants to switch to SSI, persistently high poverty rates, and increases in the share of the population in fair or poor health.A number of previous studies looked at the effects of economic conditions on growth in disability program caseloads. However, much of that work focused on Social Security Disability Insurance (DI), which is limited to individuals who meet that program's earnings-history thresholds and who therefore may be more responsive to economic conditions. Most research focusing specifically on SSI dates from the 1990s. Those studies found that higher unemployment was associated with increases in SSI application and caseloads (Rupp and Stapleton 1995; Stapleton and others 1998; Stapleton and others 1999). The relationship between economic conditions and SSI application may have evolved significantly since then. Given rapid growth in the SSI rolls and the slow pace of recovery from the Great Recession, understanding the role that business cycles play in determining SSI participation has become increasingly important.In this article, we examine the relationship between economic conditions and working-age adult SSI application from 1996 through 2010 using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) linked to SSA's 831 data file. These restricted-access data allow us to link detailed SIPP information on demographic conditions and unemployment spells with precise SSA records on the month of first application for SSI and DI benefits. Using hazard models, we estimate SSI and DI application risk among individuals who were working when first observed in the SIPP but were unemployed during follow-up surveys in their respective SIPP panels, and examine the effect of the unemployment rate both at the time of job loss (the baseline rate) and at the time of-that is, contemporaneous with-SSI application. Whereas the contemporaneous measure reflects local labor market conditions at the time of application, the baseline rate may reflect differential characteristics of the pool of unemployed workers related to the business cycle. Our results suggest that application risk increases significantly with higher contemporaneous state unemployment rates. …
[1]
S. Lindner.
How Do Unemployment Insurance Benefits Affect the Decision to Apply for Social Security Disability Insurance?
,
2016,
The Journal of Human Resources.
[2]
Andreas I. Mueller,et al.
Unemployment Insurance and Disability Insurance in the Great Recession
,
2013,
Journal of Labor Economics.
[3]
Mark Duggan,et al.
The Supplemental Security Income (Ssi) Program
,
2015
.
[4]
Gretchen Rowe,et al.
The Child SSI Program and the Changing Safety Net
,
2015
.
[5]
Matthew S. Rutledge,et al.
WHY DO SSI AND SNAP ENROLLMENTS RISE IN GOOD ECONOMIC TIMES AND BAD
,
2014
.
[6]
Stephen Pimpare.
The Other Welfare: Supplemental Security Income and U.S. Social Policy
,
2014
.
[7]
Matthew J. Notowidigdo,et al.
Duration Dependence and Labor Market Conditions: Evidence from a Field Experiment*
,
2013
.
[8]
E. Berkowitz,et al.
The Other Welfare: Supplemental Security Income and U.S. Social Policy
,
2013
.
[9]
Alexander Strand,et al.
Identifying SSA's Sequential Disability Determination Steps Using Administrative Data
,
2013
.
[10]
K. Rupp.
Factors Affecting Initial Disability Allowance Rates for the Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income Programs: The Role of the Demographic and Diagnostic Composition of Applicants and Local Labor Market Conditions
,
2012,
Social security bulletin.
[11]
Andreas I. Mueller.
Separations, Sorting and Cyclical Unemployment
,
2012,
SSRN Electronic Journal.
[12]
John F. Burton, Jr.,et al.
The Growth in Applications for Social Security Disability Insurance: A Spillover Effect from Workers’ Compensation
,
2012,
Social security bulletin.
[13]
A. Nichols,et al.
The Impact of Temporary Assistance Programs on Disability Rolls and Re-Employment
,
2012
.
[14]
Norma B Coe,et al.
What Explains State Variation in SSDI Application Rates?
,
2011
.
[15]
M. Bitler,et al.
Immigrants, Welfare Reform, and the U.S. Safety Net
,
2011
.
[16]
S. W. Washington.
Estimated Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on Employment and Economic Output from
,
2011
.
[17]
R. Disney,et al.
Disability, Capacity for Work and the Business Cycle: An International Perspective
,
2009
.
[18]
P. Davies,et al.
Measurement Issues Associated with Using Survey Data Matched with Administrative Data from the Social Security Administration
,
2009,
Social security bulletin.
[19]
Bruce D. Meyer,et al.
The Under-Reporting of Transfers in Household Surveys: Its Nature and Consequences
,
2009
.
[20]
J. Hemmeter,et al.
Characteristics of Noninstitutionalized DI and SSI Program Participants, 2010 Update
,
2014
.
[21]
W. V. D. Klaauw,et al.
The work disincentive effects of the disability insurance program in the 1990s
,
2008
.
[22]
Lael R. Keiser,et al.
Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper no. 1292-05 The Political Roots of Disability Claims: How State Environments and Policies Shape Citizen Demands
,
2005
.
[23]
L. Schmidt,et al.
AFDC, SSI, and Welfare Reform Aggressiveness
,
2004,
The Journal of Human Resources.
[24]
Jeffrey D. Kubik.
Fiscal Federalism and Welfare Policy: The Role of States in the Growth of Child SSI
,
2003,
National Tax Journal.
[25]
David H. Autor,et al.
The Rise in the Disability Rolls and the Decline in Unemployment
,
2003
.
[26]
D. Black,et al.
The Impact of Economic Conditions on Participation in Disability Programs: Evidence from the Coal Boom and Bust.
,
2002,
The American economic review.
[27]
A. Nichols,et al.
Tracking the Household Income of SSDI and SSI Applicants
,
2001
.
[28]
John Rust,et al.
How Large is the Bias is Self-Reported Disability?
,
2000
.
[29]
John Bound,et al.
The Illusion of Failure: Trends in the Self-Reported Health of the U.S. Elderly
,
1995,
The Milbank quarterly.
[30]
D. Stapleton,et al.
Determinants of the growth in the Social Security Administration's disability programs--an overview.
,
1995,
Social security bulletin.