Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings.

The contrast dependence of simultaneous masking has been measured using isochromatic yellow-black luminance sinusoids and isoluminant red-green chrominance gratings. Masking functions for all four combinations of chromatic and luminance masks and tests are reported. In the two same-on-same conditions (luminance mask/luminance test and chromatic mask/chromatic test) these functions (increment threshold contrast versus mask contrast) have the typical dipper shape and are almost identical when test and mask contrasts are normalized to the unmasked contrast thresholds. The contrast dependence of the luminance mask/color test and color mask/luminance test functions are quite different. The luminance mask/color test shows facilitation over a broad range of both subthreshold and suprathreshold contrasts of the luminance mask. In the color mask/luminance test condition facilitation is never observed, but at suprathreshold contrasts a 2-cycle/degree (c/deg) chromatic grating masks a 2-c/deg luminance grating as strongly as does a luminance mask. The luminance mask/chromatic test results are invariant over the 0.25-2-c/deg spatial-frequency range, whereas the robust masking of luminance by color at 2 c/deg diminishes at lower spatial frequencies. The spatial-frequency selectivity of the luminance-facilitates-color interaction is much broader than facilitatory interactions in either the color-color or luminance-luminance conditions. Possible mechanisms of color-luminance interactions are considered. The lack of facilitation in the color mask/luminance test condition precludes a simple pedestal interpretation of this masking interaction. The data are, however, consistent with models that invoke inhibitory or more elaborate excitatory masking interactions.

[1]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Orientation and spatial frequency selectivity of adaptation to color and luminance gratings , 1988, Vision Research.

[2]  E Switkes,et al.  Simultaneous masking interactions between chromatic and luminance gratings. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  O. Favreau,et al.  Interference in Colour-Contingent Motion After-Effects , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatiotemporal chromaticity discrimination. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  G Huppmann,et al.  Influence of luminance contrast on hue discrimination. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The orientation specificity of two visual after‐effects , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[8]  R T Verrillo,et al.  Vibrotacile masking of Pacinian and non-Pacinian channels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Color and luminance share a common motion pathway , 1985, Vision Research.

[11]  I. Powell,et al.  Lenses for correcting chromatic aberration of the eye. , 1981, Applied optics.

[12]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  S A Burns,et al.  Chromaticity discrimination: effects of luminance contrast and spatial frequency. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial mapping of monkey VI cells with pure color and luminance stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  E. M. Granger,et al.  Visual chromaticity-modulation transfer function , 1973 .

[16]  A. Bradley,et al.  The longitudinal chromatic aberration of the human eye, and its correction , 1986, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[19]  G. Legge A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[20]  G. Legge Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[21]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance , 1983 .

[22]  D. H. Kelly Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[23]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[24]  Dan J. Swift,et al.  Spatial frequency masking and Weber's Law , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  K. D. Valois Interactions Among Spatial Frequency Channels In The Human Visual System , 1978 .

[26]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  Robert M. Boynton,et al.  16 – Ten Years of Research with the Minimally Distinct Border1 , 1978 .

[28]  K. Mullen The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red‐green and blue‐yellow chromatic gratings. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Interactions between spatial frequency channels , 1978, Vision Research.

[30]  R. Shapley,et al.  X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  C. B. Gillman,et al.  Factors affecting luminance additivity at threshold among normal and color-blind subjects and elaborations of a trichromatic-opponent colors theory. , 1968, Vision research.

[32]  A L Lewis,et al.  A modified achromatizing lens. , 1982, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[33]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[34]  W. Merigan,et al.  Acrylamide effects on the macaque visual system. I. Psychophysics and electrophysiology. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  L. Riggs,et al.  Color differences scaled by chromatic modulation sensitivity functions , 1978, Vision Research.

[36]  D M Green,et al.  Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[38]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Color and luminance: independent frequency shifts. , 1981, Science.

[39]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  F. Campbell,et al.  Orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[42]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[43]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.