The biggest choke point in an academic career is going from postdoc to principal investigator (PI): moving from doing someone else’s research to getting other people to do yours. Being a PI is a fundamentally different job to being a postdoc; they just happen to be in the same environment. It is not an easy transition. It draws on few of the skills you learn at the bench, and the odds are clearly not ever in your favor. So, calling this article Ten Simple Rules is obviously a simplification. It is more accurate to call them ten tricky steps. In this article, we use PI to mean anyone who runs their own research group using funding that they have been awarded to answer their own questions. PI encompasses a number of different job titles depending on where the research is performed: fellow, lecturer, reader, associate professor, and senior scientist. One test is whether you can describe the people working for you as the X group, in which X is your surname. The normal route from undergraduate to lab head involves a PhD, one or more postdoc positions, and then PI. Given the diversity of ways to be a PI, the final step up from postdoc takes a number of forms. In the United Kingdom, this tends to be either an individual fellowship or a lecturer position, and in the United States, it generally starts with an independent position with associated funding—either as a start-up package or funded grant. The aim of this article is to identify some of the broader skills (rules 1–4) and behaviors (rules 5–10) that can help with getting a PI position. It is meant as advice not instruction. As you will see, we are advocating the development of social intelligence, which is as useful in the world outside academia as within it.
[1]
Stephen F. King.
On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft
,
2000
.
[2]
Roy Peter Clark.
Writing tools : 50 essential strategies for every writer
,
2008
.
[3]
Shoba Ranganathan.
Towards a career in bioinformatics
,
2009,
BMC Bioinformatics.
[4]
Philip E. Bourne,et al.
Ten Simple Rules for Writing a PLOS Ten Simple Rules Article
,
2014,
PLoS Comput. Biol..
[5]
Jessica Wade,et al.
The reward and risk of social media for academics
,
2019,
Nature Reviews Chemistry.
[6]
Matthew Partridge,et al.
Ten simple rules for drawing scientific comics
,
2018,
PLoS Comput. Biol..
[7]
C. Dweck.
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
,
2006
.
[8]
Barbara Jean Fark.
Life Is What You Make It
,
1943
.
[9]
Marla Parker,et al.
Factors that Influence the Transition of University Postdocs to Non-Academic Scientific Careers: An Exploratory Study
,
2018,
Research Policy.
[10]
David van Dijk,et al.
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
,
2014,
Current Biology.
[11]
Kathy Barker,et al.
At the Helm: Leading Your Laboratory
,
2010
.
[12]
L. Puljak,et al.
Postdocs' perceptions of work environment and career prospects at a US academic institution
,
2009
.
[13]
Joshua Schimel.
Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded
,
2011
.
[14]
John Tregoning.
How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
,
2018,
Nature.
[15]
A. Persky.
Intellectual Self-doubt and How to Get Out of It
,
2018,
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.