The Use of Bioimpedance Analysis to Evaluate Lymphedema

Background:Lymphedema, a chronic disfiguring condition resulting from lymphatic dysfunction or disruption, can be difficult to accurately diagnose and manage. Of particular challenge is identifying the presence of clinically significant limb swelling through simple and noninvasive methods. Many historical and currently used techniques for documenting differences in limb volume, including volume displacement and circumferential measurements, have proven difficult and unreliable. Bioimpedance spectroscopy analysis, a technology that uses resistance to electrical current in comparing the composition of fluid compartments within the body, has been considered as a cost-effective and reproducible alternative for evaluating patients with suspected lymphedema. Patients and Methods:All patients were recruited through the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Lymphedema Clinic. A total of 15 patients (mean age: 55.2 years) with upper-extremity or lower-extremity lymphedema as documented by lymphoscintigraphy underwent bioimpedance spectroscopy analysis using an Impedimed SFB7 device. Seven healthy medical students and surgical residents (mean age: 26.9 years) were selected to serve as normal controls. All study participants underwent analysis of both limbs, which allowed participants to act as their own controls. The multifrequency bioimpedance device documented impedance values for each limb, with lower values correlating with higher levels of accumulated protein-rich edematous fluid. Results:The average ratio of impedance to current flow of the affected limb to the unaffected limb in lymphedema patients was 0.9 (range: 0.67 to 1.01). In the control group, the average impedance ratio of the participant's dominant limb to their nondominant limb was 0.99 (range: 0.95 to 1.02) (P = 0.01). Conclusions:Bioimpedance spectroscopy can be used as a reliable and accurate tool for documenting the presence of lymphedema in patients with either upper- or lower-extremity swelling. Measurement with the device is quick and simple and results are reproducible among patients. Given significant limitations with other methods of evaluating lymphedema, the use of bioimpedance analysis may aid in the diagnosis of lymphedema and allow for tracking patients over time as they proceed with treatment of their disease.

[1]  N. Piller,et al.  Combined opto-electronic perometry and bioimpedance to measure objectively the effectiveness of a new treatment intervention for chronic secondary leg lymphedema. , 2002, Lymphology.

[2]  C. Hirst,et al.  Early Diagnosis of Lymphedema in Postsurgery Breast Cancer Patients , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  L. Ward Bioelectrical impedance analysis: proven utility in lymphedema risk assessment and therapeutic monitoring. , 2006, Lymphatic research and biology.

[4]  L C Ward,et al.  Reliability of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: An intermachine comparison , 1997, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[5]  L. Ward,et al.  Post‐mastectomy lymphoedema treatment and measurement , 1994, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  H. Brorson Liposuction Gives Complete Reduction of Chronic Large Arm Lymphedema After Breast Cancer , 2000, Acta oncologica.

[7]  H. Kanai,et al.  Evaluation of leg edema using a multifrequency impedance meter in patients with lymphatic obstruction. , 1989, Lymphology.

[8]  E Benda,et al.  Direct and indirect methods for the quantification of leg volume: comparison between water displacement volumetry, the disk model method and the frustum sign model method, using the correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[9]  L. C. Jones,et al.  Bioelectrical impedance for monitoring the efficacy of lymphoedema treatment programmes , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  B. Cornish Bioelectrical impedance analysis revisited. , 2000, Lymphology.

[11]  G. Chertow,et al.  Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance estimates the distribution of body water. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  C. Dym,et al.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis revisited. , 1999, Lymphology.

[13]  H. Brorson Adipose tissue in lymphedema: the ignorance of adipose tissue in lymphedema. , 2004, Lymphology.

[14]  L. C. Jones,et al.  MuIti‐frequency bioelectrical impedance augments the diagnosis and management of lymphoedema in post‐mastectomy patients , 1992, European journal of clinical investigation.

[15]  H. Brorson Liposuction in arm lymphedema treatment. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.