A method of fast, sequential experimental design for linearized geophysical inverse problems

SUMMARY An algorithm for linear(ized) experimental design is developed for a determinant-based design objective function. This objective function is common in design theory and is used to design experiments that minimize the model entropy, a measure of posterior model uncertainty. Of primary significance in design problems is computational expediency. Several earlier papers have focused attention on posing design objective functions and opted to use global search methods for finding the critical points of these functions, but these algorithms are too slow to be practical. The proposed technique is distinguished primarily for its computational efficiency, which derives partly from a greedy optimization approach, termed sequential design. Computational efficiency is further enhanced through formulae for updating determinants and matrix inverses without need for direct calculation. The design approach is orders of magnitude faster than a genetic algorithm applied to the same design problem. However, greedy optimization often trades global optimality for increased computational speed; the ramifications of this tradeoff are discussed. The design methodology is demonstrated on a simple, single-borehole DC electrical resistivity problem. Designed surveys are compared with random and standard surveys, both with and without prior information. All surveys were compared with respect to a ‘relative quality’ measure, the post-inversion model per cent rms error. The issue of design for inherently ill-posed inverse problems is considered and an approach for circumventing such problems is proposed. The design algorithm is also applied in an adaptive manner, with excellent results suggesting that smart, compact experiments can be designed in real time.

[1]  Zhiyi I. Zhang,et al.  Inversions of surface and borehole data from large-loop transient electromagnetic system over a 1-D earth , 2001 .

[2]  A. Curtis,et al.  Optimal Cross-borehole Tomographic Geometries , 1998 .

[3]  H. Wynn The Sequential Generation of $D$-Optimum Experimental Designs , 1970 .

[4]  J. Chambers,et al.  Optimization of array configurations and panel combinations for the detection and imaging of abandoned mineshafts using 3D cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography , 2006 .

[5]  S. H. Ward,et al.  Inversion of borehole normal resistivity logs , 1984 .

[6]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity , 1981 .

[7]  A. Curtis Optimal experiment design: cross-borehole tomographic examples , 1999 .

[8]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Optimized and robust experimental design: a non-linear application to EM sounding , 1998 .

[9]  P. Laycock,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs , 1995 .

[10]  E. Haber,et al.  Numerical methods for experimental design of large-scale linear ill-posed inverse problems , 2008 .

[11]  H. L. Lucas,et al.  DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS IN NON-LINEAR SITUATIONS , 1959 .

[12]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Outer-space sensitivities in geoelectrical tomography , 2006 .

[13]  Hongnian Wang,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of geometric parameter and resistivity around borehole in horizontally stratified formation from multiarray induction logging data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Jie Zhang,et al.  3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients , 1995 .

[15]  Emanuel Winterfors,et al.  Numerical detection and reduction of non-uniqueness in nonlinear inverse problems , 2008 .

[16]  Biwen Xu,et al.  Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: a preliminary study , 1991 .

[17]  Weiqun Shi,et al.  Advanced modeling and inversion techniques for three-dimensional geoelectrical surveys , 1998 .

[18]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Optimal design of focused experiments and surveys , 1999 .

[19]  S. Friedel,et al.  Resolution, stability and efficiency of resistivity tomography estimated from a generalized inverse approach , 2003 .

[20]  Ty P. A. Ferré,et al.  Optimization of ERT Surveys for Monitoring Transient Hydrological Events Using Perturbation Sensitivity and Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .

[21]  Klaus Spitzer,et al.  A dc resistivity and IP borehole survey at the Casa Berardi gold mine in northwestern Quebec , 2003 .

[22]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[23]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[24]  Liang C. Shen,et al.  Response of electromagnetic-pulse logging sonde in axially symmetrical formation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Stanley H. Ward,et al.  Inversion of borehole normal resistivity logs , 1984 .

[26]  J. Scales,et al.  Robust methods in inverse theory , 1988 .

[27]  Jonathan Chambers,et al.  Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations , 2006 .

[28]  Carl Wunsch,et al.  Oceanographic Experiment Design by Simulated Annealing , 1990 .

[29]  Biwen Xu,et al.  ON THE COMPLETENESS OF DATA SETS WITH MULTIELECTRODE SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SURVEY , 1993 .

[30]  H. Wynn,et al.  Maximum entropy sampling and optimal Bayesian experimental design , 2000 .

[31]  Andrzej Kijko,et al.  An algorithm for the optimum distribution of a regional seismic network—I , 1977 .

[32]  C. Swift,et al.  Theoretical magnetotelluric and turam response from two-dimensional inhomogeneities , 1971 .

[33]  David M. Steinberg,et al.  Configuring a seismographic network for optimal monitoring of fault lines and multiple sources , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[34]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[35]  V. R. Rao,et al.  Model parameterization and experimental design issues in nearshore bathymetry inversion , 2004 .

[36]  Alan G. Green,et al.  Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information , 2004 .

[37]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Optimal nonlinear Bayesian experimental design: an application to amplitude versus offset experiments , 2003 .

[38]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[39]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Optimal Survey Design Using the Point Spread Function Measure of Resolution , 2005 .

[40]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Design strategies for electromagnetic geophysical surveys , 2000 .

[41]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Electrical resistance tomography. , 2000 .

[42]  Anthony Lomax,et al.  A deterministic algorithm for experimental design applied to tomographic and microseismic monitoring surveys , 2004 .

[43]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Optimizing the design of geophysical experiments: Is it worthwhile? , 2000 .

[44]  Gail Heath,et al.  Spatial focusing of electrical resistivity surveys considering geologic and hydrologic layering , 2007 .

[45]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Optimized design of geophysical experiments , 1997 .

[46]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS , 2007 .

[47]  W. J. Studden,et al.  Theory Of Optimal Experiments , 1972 .

[48]  Hansruedi Maurer,et al.  Optimization of DC resistivity data acquisition: real-time experimental design and a new multielectrode system , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[49]  Andrew Curtis,et al.  Survey Design Strategies For Linearized Nonlinear Inversion , 1999 .

[50]  David M. Steinberg,et al.  Optimal configuration of a seismographic network: A statistical approach , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.