Combining User Tagging and Automatically Generated Storyboards for Digital Video Retrieval: An Exploratory Study

This is an exploratory study investigating the concept of combining social and automated digital video surrogates with the intention of improving user understanding and retrieval of video. Videos were shown to participants who were then asked to tag the videos according to two systems. The control group tagged videos in the traditional manner of tagging the whole video in one input form. The experimental group tagged a storyboard with multiple input forms corresponding to the storyboard. The findings of this study suggest that the implementation of a system that combines automatically generated storyboards with social tagging will significantly increase the number of tags that each user will add to a video. In all aspects of the results, there was significant increase in the amount of tags created in the storyboard system when compared to the traditional system of tagging an entire video. The results suggest that it is worth investigating in future work.

[1]  Christian Wolff,et al.  Tree, funny, to_read, google: what are tags supposed to achieve? a comparative analysis of user keywords for different digital resource types , 2008, SSM '08.

[2]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  How fast is too fast? evaluating fast forward surrogates for digital video , 2003, 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2003. Proceedings..

[3]  George Macgregor,et al.  Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool , 2006 .

[4]  Leslie L. Roos,et al.  Quasi-experimental approaches; testing theory and evaluating policy , 1973 .

[5]  S. H. Srinivasan,et al.  Tagboards for video tagging , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[6]  Rong Yan,et al.  Merging storyboard strategies and automatic retrieval for improving interactive video search , 2007, CIVR '07.

[7]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Multimedia surrogates for video gisting: Toward combining spoken words and imagery , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory , 2008, ICWSM.

[9]  Donald H. Kraft,et al.  Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research in information science , 1984, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Valentin Robu,et al.  The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging , 2007, WWW '07.

[11]  Gary Geisler,et al.  Tagging video: conventions and strategies of the YouTube community , 2007, JCDL '07.

[12]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  The relative effectiveness of concept-based versus content-based video retrieval , 2004, MULTIMEDIA '04.

[14]  Michael G. Christel,et al.  Finding the right shots: assessing usability and performance of a digital video library interface , 2004, MULTIMEDIA '04.

[15]  David M. Nichols,et al.  How people find videos , 2008, JCDL '08.

[16]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[17]  Mark S. Melenhorst,et al.  Tag-based information retrieval of video content , 2008, UXTV '08.

[18]  Michael G. Christel Supporting video library exploratory search: when storyboards are not enough , 2008, CIVR '08.

[19]  Brian C. O'Connor,et al.  Access to Moving Image Documents: Background Concepts and Proposals for Surrogates for film and video Works , 1985, J. Documentation.