More bang for your buck: Small firms and the importance of aligned information technology capabilities and strategic flexibility

Information technology (IT) has been recognized for its potential to contribute to sustained competitive advantage for firms, however, research on the relationship between information technology spending and firm performance has produced inconsistent results, leading many to note an apparent “productivity paradox.” This potential hazard is particularly acute for small businesses that do not have sufficient slack resources to absorb unproductive spending. To address this issue, we suggest that a small firm's ability to develop aligned information technology capabilities will affect its ability to use strategic flexibility to proactively anticipate and react to needed changes, thereby improving firm performance. Results of the study, based on a sample of 160 small firms, largely support the proposed model. The work holds important implications for future research and management related to the dynamics of how firm IT capabilities are translated into firm performance.

[1]  P. Weill,et al.  Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructures , 1997 .

[2]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[3]  Stig Vinberg,et al.  Information technology and learning strategies in small enterprises , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  G. Day,et al.  Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[5]  Namchul Shin.  Creating business value with information technology : challenges and solutions / [edited by] Namchul Shin. , 2003 .

[6]  Jooh Lee,et al.  Operational linkage between diverse dimensions of information technology investments and multifaceted aspects of a firm's economic performance , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility , 2001 .

[8]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[9]  John C.S. Tang,et al.  The effects of size and information technology on hospital efficiency , 2004 .

[10]  G. Pazilkhairova.  Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors , 2009 .

[11]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[12]  F. Caeldries.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1994 .

[13]  S. Bruque,et al.  Determinants of information technology competitive value. Evidence from a western European industry , 2003 .

[14]  David Carson,et al.  A philosophy for marketing education in small firms , 1993 .

[15]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  V. Mahajan,et al.  An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on business performance , 2003 .

[17]  Smarter Workflow,et al.  Built to Last , 2007 .

[18]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  Investigating the relationship between strategic alignment and IT business value: the discovery of a paradox , 2003 .

[19]  Glenn M. Pfeiffer,et al.  Technology R&D alliances and firm value , 2001 .

[20]  L. Richard Ye,et al.  Information technology and firm performance: Linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Russell Wayne Coff,et al.  Roadblocks to competitive advantage: how organizational constraints and individual decision biases hinder investments in strategic assets , 2001 .

[22]  E. H. Khan,et al.  Microcomputers and Small Businesses in Bahrain , 1992 .

[23]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[24]  S. Zahra,et al.  Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance , 1993 .

[25]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Search for Strategic Advantage from the World Wide Web , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[26]  Sucheta Nadkarni,et al.  STRATEGY FRAMES, STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF INDUSTRY CLOCKSPEED. , 2004 .

[27]  Blake Ives,et al.  In Search of Sustainability: Reaping Long-term Advantage from Investments in Information Technology , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[29]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[30]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Returns on Investments in Information Technology: A Research Synthesis , 2002, J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage , 1997 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[34]  T. Yu.  Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm , 2001 .

[35]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[36]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Where do resources come from? a model of resource generation , 1999 .

[37]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[38]  R. Sanchez.  Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[39]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[40]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[41]  T. Fuller.  Fulfilling IT Needs in Small Businesses; A Recursive Learning Model , 1996 .

[42]  G. Day.  Continuous Learning about Markets , 1994 .

[43]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  Perceived Environmental Dynamism and Managerial Risk Aversion as Antecedents of Manufacturing Outsourcing: The Moderating Effects of Firm Maturity , 2004 .

[44]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Market-focused strategic flexibility: Conceptual advances and an integrative model , 2003 .

[45]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[46]  Pritam K. Shrestha,et al.  Information technology and productivity: a comparison of Japanese and Asia-Pacific banks , 2003 .

[47]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[48]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[49]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .