A Wind Tunnel Two-Dimensional Parametric Investigation of Biplane Configurations

This paper presents an experimental and systematic investigation about how geometric parameters on a biplane configuration have an influence on aerodynamic parameters. This experimental investigation has been developed in a two-dimensional approach. Theoretical studies about biplanes configurations have been developed in the past, but there is not enough information about experimental wind tunnel data at low Reynolds number. This two-dimensional study is a first step to further tridimensional investigations about the box wing configuration. The main objective of the study is to find the relationships between the geometrical parameters which present the best aerodynamic behavior: the highest lift, the lowest drag and the lowest slope of the pitching moment. A tridimensional wing-box model will be designed following the pattern of the two dimensional study conclusions. It will respond to the geometrical relationships that have been considered to show the better aerodynamic behavior. This box-wing model will be studied in the aim of comparing the advantages and disadvantages between this biplane configuration and the plane configuration, looking for implementing the box-wing in the UAV?s field. Although the box wing configuration has been used in a small number of existing UAV, prestigious researchers have found it as a field of high aerodynamic and structural potential.

[1]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Innovations in Aeronautics , 2004 .

[2]  Fahad Aman Khan,et al.  Preliminary aerodynamic investigation of box-wing configurations using low fidelity codes , 2010 .

[3]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  DRAG DUE TO LIFT: Concepts for Prediction and Reduction , 2001 .

[4]  J. Wolkovitch,et al.  The joined wing - An overview , 1985 .

[5]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[6]  L. Prandtl.  Induced drag of multiplanes , 1924 .

[7]  Reg Austin,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Uavs Design, Development and Deployment , 2010 .

[8]  T. Mueller,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF SMALL VEHICLES , 2003 .

[9]  Miguel Angel Barcala Montejano,et al.  Experimental investigation on box-wing configuration for UAS , 2011 .

[10]  Miguel Angel Barcala Montejano,et al.  The Application of Rapid Prototyping in the Design of an UAV. , 2010 .

[11]  Egbert Torenbeek,et al.  Synthesis of subsonic airplane design: an introduction to the preliminary design, of subsonic general aviation and transport aircraft, with emphasis on layout, aerodynamic design, propulsion and performance , 1976 .

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerostructural Optimization of Nonplanar Lifting Surfaces , 2010 .

[13]  Egbert Torenbeek.  BLENDED WING BODY AND ALL-WING AIRLINERS , 2007 .

[14]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[15]  Aldo Frediani.  The Prandtl Wing , 2005 .

[16]  Max M Munk,et al.  The Minimum Induced Drag of Aerofoils , 1979 .

[17]  H. Glauert.  Wind Tunnel Interference on Wings, Bodies and Airscrews , 1933 .

[18]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2009 .

[19]  Aldo Frediani,et al.  The development of a PrandtlPlane aircraft configuration , 2003 .

[20]  M. A. Barcala-Montejano,et al.  Systems integration in a UAS design. An example of undergraduate students' tasks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[21]  H. H. Heyson.  Rapid estimation of wind-tunnel corrections with application to wind-tunnel and model design , 1971 .