Do pirates play fair? Testing copyright awareness of sports viewers

ABSTRACT Ethical norms are believed to be followed more loosely on the Internet than in the ‘real world’. This proposition is often evoked to explain the prevalence of so-called digital piracy. In this study, we provide evidence from a vignette experiment that contradicts this claim. Analysing the case of sports broadcast, we compare explicitly the ethical judgement of legal and illegal sharing in the offline and online contexts. We find that the norms concerning legality, availability of alternatives and deriving material benefits from sharing content do not differ substantially between the virtual and real worlds. We also test explicitly for the role of legal awareness and find that emphasising what is prohibited (copyright infringement) is less effective than focusing on what is permitted (fair use) in reducing the disparity between legal and ethical norms.

[1]  Sameer Hinduja,et al.  Deindividuation and Internet Software Piracy , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[3]  H. Kokkinen,et al.  Criminal Friends of Entertainment: Analysing Results from Recent Peer-to-Peer Surveys , 2008 .

[4]  Joseph G. Pigeon,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation and Discovery , 2006, Technometrics.

[5]  G. Smith.  ANARCHY, STATE, AND UTOPIA , 1976 .

[6]  O. Goodenough,et al.  Why do Good People Steal Intellectual Property , 2008 .

[7]  Majid Yar.  The rhetorics and myths of anti-piracy campaigns: criminalization, moral pedagogy and capitalist property relations in the classroom , 2008, New Media Soc..

[8]  Eric S. Kyper,et al.  An investigation of the intention to share media files over peer-to-peer networks , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Mirosław Filiciak,et al.  The Circulations of Culture - On Social Distribution of Content , 2012 .

[10]  Suzannah Mirghani.  The War on Piracy: Analyzing the Discursive Battles of Corporate and Government-Sponsored Anti-Piracy Media Campaigns , 2011 .

[11]  Janice Nadler,et al.  Expressive Law and File Sharing Norms , 2005 .

[12]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  SOCIAL NORMS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Online norms and the European legal development , 2009 .

[13]  S. Shavell.  When Is Compliance with the Law Socially Desirable? , 2012, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[14]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Do Incentive Contracts Undermine Voluntary Cooperation? , 2002 .

[15]  Mateja Kos Koklic,et al.  The study of perceived adverse effects of digital piracy and involvement: insights from adult computer users , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  A. Collins,et al.  Sailing in the same ship? differences in factors motivating piracy of music and movie content. , 2014 .

[17]  David Rowe,et al.  Sport Beyond Television: The Internet, Digital Media and the Rise of Networked Media Sport , 2012 .

[18]  Kay Mathiesen,et al.  What is Information Ethics? , 2004, CSOC.

[19]  M. Krawczyk,et al.  “Piracy is not theft!” Is it just students who think so? , 2015 .

[20]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Law, norms, piracy and online anonymity: Practices of de‐identification in the global file sharing community , 2012 .

[21]  L. Kohlberg.  The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgment , 1973 .

[22]  Cheolho Yoon,et al.  Digital piracy intention: a comparison of theoretical models , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Attitudes towards software piracy in South Africa: Knowledge of Intellectual Property Laws as a moderator , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  S. Durvasula,et al.  Digital piracy of MP3s: consumer and ethical predispositions , 2008 .

[25]  S. Hunt,et al.  A General Theory of Marketing Ethics , 1986 .

[26]  Tarleton Gillespie.  Characterizing Copyright in the Classroom: The Cultural Work of Antipiracy Campaigns , 2009 .

[27]  Richard H. McAdams,et al.  An Attitudinal Theory of Expressive Law , 2000 .

[28]  L. Floridi.  Information Ethics: An Environmental Approach to the Digital Divide , 2002 .

[29]  Richard H. McAdams,et al.  A Focal Point Theory of Expressive Law , 2000 .

[30]  Tilman Steinert,et al.  Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. A case vignette study in 16 European countries , 2009, European Psychiatry.

[31]  Janice Nadler,et al.  The Law and Norms of File Sharing , 2006 .

[32]  Sanctions that Signal: an Experiment , 2010 .

[33]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  J. Andersson.  Learning from the file‐sharers: Civic modes of justification versus industrial ones , 2012 .

[35]  Robert D. Cooter,et al.  Expressive Law And Economics , 1998, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[36]  A. Rustichini,et al.  A Fine is a Price , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.