Germline and somatic variant identification using BGISEQ-500 and HiSeq X Ten whole genome sequencing

Technological innovation and increased affordability have contributed to the widespread adoption of genome sequencing technologies in biomedical research. In particular large cancer research consortia have embraced next generation sequencing, and have used the technology to define the somatic mutation landscape of multiple cancer types. These studies have primarily utilised the Illumina HiSeq platforms. In this study we performed whole genome sequencing of three malignant pleural mesothelioma and matched normal samples using a new platform, the BGISEQ-500, and compared the results obtained with Illumina HiSeq X Ten. Germline and somatic, single nucleotide variants and small insertions or deletions were independently identified from data aligned human genome reference. The BGISEQ-500 and HiSeq X Ten platforms showed high concordance for germline calls with genotypes from SNP arrays (>99%). The germline and somatic single nucleotide variants identified in both sequencing platforms were highly concordant (86% and 72% respectively). These results indicate the potential applicability of the BGISEQ-500 platform for the identification of somatic and germline single nucleotide variants by whole genome sequencing. The BGISEQ-500 datasets described here represent the first publicly-available cancer genome sequencing performed using this platform.

[1]  klaguia International Network of Cancer Genome Projects , 2010 .

[2]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[3]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Gary D Bader,et al.  International network of cancer genome projects , 2010, Nature.

[5]  James Y. Zou Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans , 2015, Nature.

[6]  Michael C. Heinold,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of somatic mutation detection in cancer using whole-genome sequencing , 2015, Nature Communications.

[7]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[8]  Joshy George,et al.  Whole–genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer , 2015, Nature.

[9]  T. Sicheritz-Pontén,et al.  Comparative performance of the BGISEQ-500 vs Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencing platforms for palaeogenomic sequencing , 2017, GigaScience.

[10]  Elaine R. Mardis,et al.  A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology , 2011, Nature.

[11]  Jianmin Wu,et al.  qpure: A Tool to Estimate Tumor Cellularity from Genome-Wide Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Profiles , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[13]  Peter J. Campbell,et al.  Genomic catastrophes frequently arise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and drive tumorigenesis , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  J. Kench,et al.  Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer , 2015, Nature.

[15]  K. A. Segraves,et al.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of chemosensory genes in two sister leaf beetles provides insights into chemosensory speciation. , 2016, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[16]  Robert B. Hartlage,et al.  This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods , 2009 .

[17]  Jianmin Wu,et al.  Somatic Point Mutation Calling in Low Cellularity Tumors , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  J. McPherson,et al.  Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  Hui Jiang,et al.  A reference human genome dataset of the BGISEQ-500 sequencer , 2017, GigaScience.

[20]  M. Stratton,et al.  Deciphering Signatures of Mutational Processes Operative in Human Cancer , 2013, Cell reports.

[21]  Pablo Cingolani,et al.  © 2012 Landes Bioscience. Do not distribute. , 2022 .

[22]  A. Alexeev,et al.  cPAS-based sequencing on the BGISEQ-500 to explore small non-coding RNAs , 2016, Clinical Epigenetics.

[23]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations , 2016, Nature Genetics.