Moving background patterns alter directionally specific responses of pigeon tectal neurons

[1]  D. M. Parker.  Evidence for the inhibition hypothesis in expanded angle illusion , 1974, Nature.

[2]  L. Maffei,et al.  The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields , 1976, Vision Research.

[3]  Diamond Al,et al.  A theory of depression and enhancement in the brightness response. , 1960 .

[4]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Movement Perception and Some Psychophysical and Behavioral Correlations , 1973 .

[5]  H. Wallach.  The perception of motion. , 1959, Scientific American.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  A Velocity Analogue of Brightness Contrast , 1973, Perception.

[7]  H. Barlow,et al.  The effects of remote retinal stimulation on the responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  P. Walker,et al.  Lateral interaction between neural channels sensitive to velocity in the human visual system , 1974, Nature.

[9]  H. Barlow,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  P Sterling,et al.  Visual receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Is texture-density contrast an inhibition or an adaptation? , 1974, Nature.

[12]  MARK GEORGESON,et al.  Antagonism between channels for pattern and movement in human vision , 1976, Nature.

[13]  K. Duncker,et al.  Über induzierte Bewegung , 1929 .

[14]  J. Nelson,et al.  Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field , 1978, Brain Research.

[15]  Theodore H. Bullock,et al.  Unit Responses in the Frog's Tectum to Moving and Nonmoving Visual Stimuli , 1963, Science.

[16]  B. Frost,et al.  Motion characteristics of single units in the pigeon optic tectum , 1976, Vision Research.