Generating proper dynamic models for truck mobility and handling

In previous work, a "proper model" was defined as the model of minimal complexity, with physically meaningful parameters, which accurately predicts dynamic system outputs. Proper models can be generated by an energy-based model reduction methodology that removes unnecessary complexity from models (linear or nonlinear) without altering the physical interpretation of the remaining parameters and variables. Energy-based model reduction allows design in a search space of reduced dimension, and in general improves computational efficiency. The current work demonstrates the effectiveness and utility of an energy-based model reduction algorithm for vehicle system modelling applications. Model reduction is performed for two different vehicle modelling applications. The first case study focuses on the vehicle dynamics model of a military heavy-duty tractor semi-trailer. The full model is developed using a classical multibody system approach and accurate reduced models are then generated for a lane change manoeuvre. The second case study develops, validates, and reduces an integrated vehicle system model of a single-unit medium-size commercial truck composed of engine, drivetrain, and vehicle dynamic subsystems. The systematically reduced model accurately predicts vehicle forward speed/acceleration and engine behaviour during full-throttle acceleration and braking with a twofold increase in computation efficiency. The reduced models generated by the energy-based methodology retain predictive quality, are useful for studying trade-offs involved in redesigning components and control strategies for improved vehicle performance, and are less computationally intensive.

[1]  Huei Peng,et al.  A Model Accuracy and Validation Algorithm , 2002 .

[2]  Hans B. Pacejka,et al.  Tyre Models for Vehicle Dynamics Analysis , 1995 .

[3]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  System Dynamics: A Unified Approach , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  An Input-Output Criterion for Linear Model Deduction , 1996 .

[5]  Bruce H. Wilson,et al.  An Algorithm for Obtaining Proper Models of Distributed and Discrete Systems , 1995 .

[6]  Jeffrey L. Stein,et al.  A template-based modeling approach for system design: theory and implementation , 1996 .

[7]  B. Moore Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .

[8]  Gregory M. Hulbert,et al.  An energy-based model reduction methodology for automated modeling , 1998 .

[9]  Michael W. Sayers,et al.  Modeling assumptions for realistic multibody simulations of the yaw and roll behavior of heavy trucks , 1996 .

[10]  John B. Ferris,et al.  Development of proper models of hybrid systems , 1994 .

[11]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Introduction to physical system dynamics , 1983 .

[12]  Michael W. Sayers,et al.  Symbolic vector/dyadic multibody formalism for tree-topology systems , 1991 .

[13]  R. J. Antoun,et al.  Vehicle dynamic handling computer simulation: model development, correlation and application using ADAMS , 1986 .

[14]  Jeffrey L. Stein,et al.  Ideal physical element representation from reduced bond graphs , 2002 .

[15]  Forbes T. Brown,et al.  Engineering system dynamics : a unified graph-centered approach , 2006 .

[16]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Constant velocity yaw/roll program: user's manual , 1982 .

[17]  John B. Ferris,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PROPER MODELS OF HYBRID SYSTEMS: A BOND GRAPH FORMULATION , 1995 .