Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance

This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test whether individuals and groups abide by monotonicity with respect to first-order stochastic dominance and Bayesian updating when making decisions under risk. The results indicate a significant number of violations of both principles. The violation rate when groups make decisions is substantially lower, and decreasing with group size, suggesting that social interaction improves the decision-making process. Greater transparency of the decision task reduces the violation rate, suggesting that these violations are due to judgment errors rather than the preference structure. In one treatment, however, less complex decisions result in a higher error rates.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[2]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  A violation of the monotonicity axiom: experimental evidence on the conjunction fallacy , 2000 .

[3]  David M. Grether,et al.  Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence , 1992 .

[4]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Are Two Heads Better Than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games , 2005 .

[5]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Conservatism in human information processing , 1982 .

[6]  J. Kagel,et al.  The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment , 1999 .

[7]  D. M. Grether,et al.  Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic , 1980 .

[8]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Errors in Probability Updating Behaviour , 1998 .

[9]  Dan Levin,et al.  The Origin of the Winner’s Curse: A Laboratory Study , 2007 .

[10]  Clive R. Bagshaw Are two heads better than one? , 1987, Nature.

[11]  Gary Charness,et al.  When Optimal Choices Feel Wrong: A Laboratory Study of Bayesian Updating, Complexity, and Affect , 2004 .

[12]  J. Morgan,et al.  Are Two Heads Better Than One?: Monetary Policy by Committee , 2005 .

[13]  Donald V. Moser,et al.  Do Asset Market Prices Reflect Traders' Judgment Biases? , 2000 .

[14]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[15]  M. El-Gamal,et al.  Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral Strategies , 1995 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[17]  M. Kocher,et al.  The Decision Maker Matters: Individual Versus Group Behaviour in Experimental Beauty-Contest Games , 2005 .

[18]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[19]  John A. List,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us About the Real World , 2006 .