Enhancing the privacy of LTE-based public safety networks

The existence of Public Safety Network(PSN) is critical for saving lives in tragic incidents. Within PSN, privacy preservation becomes vital since the information being transferred may be personally identifiable (or private for short). Long Term Evolution(LTE) has been chosen to be the suitable technology for PSN because of its unique characteristics such as higher capacity, higher spectral efficiency, enhanced security and reliability and so on. In spite of those features, several issues related to privacy within LTE have been detected by the experts. However, a study of privacy challenges and requirements in PSN has not yet emerged. This study aims to highlight privacy issues of the LTE related to PSN. Thus, a comprehensive review of the relevant works proposed to improve privacy of the LTE security architecture is provided. Furthermore, the feasibility of those efforts for PSN is discussed. Finally, an efficient solution is proposed to enhance the privacy of the LTE-based PSN. The idea is to hide the real International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) within a random bit stream of certain size where only the subscriber and HSS could extract the respective IMSI. Furthermore, performance evaluation and security analysis of the proposed protocol are explored.

[1]  Igor Bilogrevic,et al.  Security and Privacy in Next Generation Mobile Networks : LTE and Femtocells , 2010 .

[2]  Basav Roychoudhury,et al.  Enhancing User Identity Privacy in LTE , 2012, 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications.

[3]  Pierangela Samarati,et al.  Location privacy in pervasive computing , 2008 .

[4]  Long Term Evolution ( LTE ) : A Technical Overview , 2022 .

[5]  Yongjun Wang,et al.  Security Enhanced Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for LTE/SAE Network , 2011, 2011 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[6]  George Tsirtsis,et al.  LTE for public safety networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  John R. Harrald,et al.  Shared Situational Awareness in Emergency Management Mitigation and Response , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[8]  Biswajit Nandy,et al.  Security advances and challenges in 4G wireless networks , 2010, 2010 Eighth International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust.

[9]  B. Ravishankar,et al.  Roaming Issues in 3GPP Security Architecture and Solution Using UMM Architecture , 2008, 2008 The Second International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies.

[10]  El Hajji Said,et al.  SNOW 3G stream cipher operation and complexity study , 2010 .

[11]  Nicolas Sklavos,et al.  LTE/SAE Security Issues on 4G Wireless Networks , 2013, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[12]  John S. Baras,et al.  Enhancing Privacy in LTE Paging System Using Physical Layer Identification , 2012, DPM/SETOP.

[13]  Dan Forsberg,et al.  Enhancing Security and Privacy in 3GPP E-UTRAN Radio Interface , 2007, 2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[14]  M. B. Simic.  Feasibility of long term evolution (LTE) as technology for public safety , 2012, 2012 20th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR).

[15]  Jacques Bou Abdo,et al.  Ensured confidentiality authentication and key agreement protocol for EPS , 2012, 2012 Symposium on Broadband Networks and Fast Internet (RELABIRA).

[16]  John R. Douceur,et al.  The Sybil Attack , 2002, IPTPS.

[17]  Wushao Wen,et al.  Non-access-stratum request attack in E-UTRAN , 2012, 2012 Computing, Communications and Applications Conference.

[18]  Sebastian Hessel,et al.  An optimized parallel and energy-efficient implementation of SNOW 3G for LTE mobile devices , 2010, 2010 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Technology.

[19]  Oriol Sallent,et al.  LTE: the technology driver for future public safety communications , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.