Structuring Discourse for Collective Interpretation

This paper reflects on three examples of a discourse-oriented approach to supporting collective interpretation. By this, we mean activities involving two or more people who are trying to make sense of an issue. The common theme linking the examples is that each mediates interpretive activity via a software environment which structures discourse: participants construct their interpretation within a representational framework which in return provides computational services. As a by-product, this persistent trace of the sensemaking process can serve as a collective memory resource for subsequent reinterpretation. Based on the three examples, we draw attention to specific challenges that discourse-structuring technologies raise, and strategies for tackling them. A generic issue emerging from this work is the design of ontologies (representational schemes) by and for communities of practice.

[1]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[2]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Analyzing the Usability of a Design Rationale Notation , 1996 .

[3]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[4]  S. E. Newman,et al.  Pushing Toulmin Too Far: Learning From an Argument Representation Scheme , 1998 .

[5]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Supporting knowledge-base evolution with incremental formalization , 1994, CHI '94.

[6]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  WinogradTerry.  A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work , 1987 .

[8]  Jintae Lee,et al.  What's in Design Rationale? , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  From documents to discourse: shifting conceptions of scholarly publishing , 1998, CHI.

[10]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  A toolkit for publishing Web discussion documents: design principles and case studies , 1998, Proceedings. 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction (Cat. No.98EX110).

[11]  Safaa H. Hashim,et al.  What: An argumentative groupware approach for organizing and documenting research activities , 1991 .

[12]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Shifting perspectives on organizational memory: from storage to active remembering , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  John B. Smith,et al.  Author's Argumentation Assistant (AAA): A Hypertext-Based Authoring Tool for Argumentative Texts , 1992, ECHT.

[14]  Enrico Motta,et al.  ScholOnto: an ontology-based digital library server for research documents and discourse , 2000, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[15]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Rapid knowledge construction: a case study in corporate contingency planning using collaborative hypermedia , 2002 .

[16]  Scott L. Minneman,et al.  A confederation of tools for capturing and accessing collaborative activity , 1995, MULTIMEDIA '95.

[17]  Raymond McCall,et al.  Design environments for constructive and argumentative design , 1989, CHI '89.

[18]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey , 1987, Computer.

[19]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Ontology-driven Knowledge Management: Philosophical, Modelling and Organizational Issues , 2001 .

[20]  Locke M. Carter,et al.  Arguments in hypertext: a rhetorical approach , 2000, HYPERTEXT '00.

[21]  S Buckingham Shum,et al.  New Scenarios in Scholarly Publishing and Debate , 1998 .

[22]  Albert M. Selvin,et al.  A framework for assessing group memory approaches for software design projects , 1997, DIS '97.

[23]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Redesigning the Peer Review Process: A Developmental Theory-in-Action , 2000, COOP.

[24]  E. Jeffrey Conklin,et al.  A process-oriented approach to design rationale , 1991 .

[25]  Nick Hammond,et al.  Graphical Argumentation and Design Cognition , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Albert M. Selvin.  Supporting Collaborative Analysis and Design with Hypertext Functionality , 1999, J. Digit. Inf..

[27]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Questioning Representations , 1991, ECSCW.

[28]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Scholarly Discourse as Computable Structure , 2000, OHS-6/SC-2.