Cross-Sectional Field Studies in Management Accounting Research - Closing the Gaps between Surveys and Case Studies Forthcoming - JMAR 2005

While empirical researchers in management accounting frequently address overlapping research issues using a variety of methods, there is little evidence of productive dialogue addressing the uncertainties and ambiguities raised within each stream of research. For example, survey researchers frequently call for deeper field-based insights into conflicting or ambiguous findings. Case study researchers convey rich organizational stories of management accounting in context. However, these field-based findings are rarely used to resolve the ambiguity in construct definition, measurement and inter-relationships that plague our empirical research bases. In this paper we seek to regenerate interest in a method that has been implemented in the past to promote productive field-based dialogue on issues related to complex constructs and their interrelationships. The method is best illustrated by the cross- sectional field study approach adopted by Merchant and Manzoni (1989) to study budget target achievability. By considering the Merchant and Manzoni study as well as two other examples (Bruns and McKinnon (1993) and Abernethy and Lillis (1995)) we identify the range of questions suited to this method and how the method contributes significant insights to the management accounting literature. We also articulate the design attributes of cross- sectional field studies by explicitly linking the rationale for these studies with the complexity of the phenomenon under study, sampling logic, instrument design and data analysis protocols. The insights produced from the relatively few published studies using a cross- sectional field study method suggest that opportunities for the application of this method may be underexploited.

[1]  David Otley,et al.  Extending the Boundaries of Management Accounting Research: Developing Systems for Performance Management☆ , 2001 .

[2]  Regine Slagmulder,et al.  Using Management Control Systems to Achieve Alignment Between Strategic Investment Decisions and Strategy , 1997 .

[3]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  Field Research in Management Accounting and Control: A Review and Evaluation , 1992 .

[4]  Anthony A. Atkinson,et al.  Standards for Field Research in Management Accounting , 1998 .

[5]  D. Larcker,et al.  Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective , 2001 .

[6]  Alan J. Richardson.  Research methods in accounting : issues and debates , 1996 .

[7]  Christine Helliar,et al.  A LONGITUDINAL CASE STUDY OF PROFITABILITY REPORTING IN A BANK , 2002 .

[8]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[9]  Maurice Gosselin.  The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing , 1997 .

[10]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design , 1995 .

[11]  F. Selto,et al.  Management Control Systems and Boundaries of the Firm: Why do Firms Outsource Internal Auditing Activities? , 1999 .

[12]  Tom Kennedy,et al.  The Impact of Activity‐Based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance , 2001 .

[13]  David Otley,et al.  Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence , 2000 .

[14]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  A framework for the analysis of interview data from multiple field research sites , 1999 .

[15]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROLS AND DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM DECISION MAKING: A FIELD STUDY. , 1985 .

[16]  Michael D. Shields.  Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s , 1997 .

[17]  David Otley,et al.  Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning? , 2000 .

[18]  William J. Bruns,et al.  Information and Managers: A Field Study , 1993 .

[19]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  ERP systems and management accounting change: opportunities or impacts? A research note , 2003 .

[20]  R. Scapens.  Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods , 1990 .

[21]  William J. Bruns,et al.  The information mosaic , 1992 .

[22]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  Managing multiple dimensions of manufacturing performance — an exploratory study , 2002 .

[23]  Christopher S. Chapman,et al.  Reflections on a contingent view of accounting , 1997 .

[24]  Thomas Ahrens,et al.  Accounting and Organizations: Realizing the Richness of Field Research , 1998 .

[25]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach , 2003 .

[26]  A. Hunter,et al.  Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles , 1989 .

[27]  Tony Davila,et al.  An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development , 2000 .

[28]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[29]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Mapping Management Accounting: Graphics and Guidelines for Theory-Consistent Empirical Research , 2003 .

[30]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[31]  Henri C. Dekker,et al.  Value Chain Analysis in Interfirm Relationships: A Field Study. , 2003 .

[32]  Kenneth A. Merchant,et al.  The achievability of budget targets in profit centers: a field study , 1989 .

[33]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[34]  Anthony J. Berry,et al.  Case study research in management accounting and control , 1994 .

[35]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[36]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  A Framework for assessing cost management system changes : the case of activity based costing implementation at General Motors, 1986-1993 , 1995 .

[37]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[38]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[40]  Alistair Preston,et al.  Interactions and arrangements in the process of informing , 1986 .

[41]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  A multi-method approach to building causal performance maps from expert knowledge , 2005 .

[42]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  Incorporating Context into the Study of Judgment and Expertise in Public Accounting , 2001 .

[43]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .

[44]  B. Spicer.  The resurgence of cost and management accounting: a review of some recent developments in practice, theories and case research methods , 1992 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  Ramji Balakrishnan,et al.  New directions in management accounting research , 1997 .