Integrating linear physical programming within collaborative optimization for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization

Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is a concurrent engineering design tool for large-scale, complex systems design that can be affected through the optimal design of several smaller functional units or subsystems. Due to the multiobjective nature of most MDO problems, recent work has focused on formulating the MDO problem to resolve tradeoffs between multiple, conflicting objectives. In this paper, we describe the novel integration of linear physical programming within the collaborative optimization framework, which enables designers to formulate multiple system-level objectives in terms of physically meaningful parameters. The proposed formulation extends our previous multiobjective formulation of collaborative optimization, which uses goal programming at the system and subsystem levels to enable multiple objectives to be considered at both levels during optimization. The proposed framework is demonstrated using a racecar design example that consists of two subsystem level analyses — force and aerodynamics — and incorporates two system-level objectives: (1) minimize lap time and (2) maximize normalized weight distribution. The aerodynamics subsystem also seeks to minimize rearwheel downforce as a secondary objective. The racecar design example is presented in detail to provide a benchmark problem for other researchers. It is solved using the proposed formulation and compared against a traditional formulation without collaborative optimization or linear physical programming. The proposed framework capitalizes on the disciplinary organization encountered during large-scale systems design.

[1]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[2]  A. Maria,et al.  Optimization of large-scale rigidified inflatable structures for housing using physical programming , 2004 .

[3]  Xuan Chen,et al.  VISUALIZING THE OPTIMIZATION PROCESS IN REAL-TIME USING PHYSICAL PROGRAMMING , 1998 .

[4]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Development and Application of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture in a Multidisciplinary Design Environment , 1995 .

[5]  Michael P. Martinez,et al.  Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming , 2002 .

[6]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization of an Internal Combustion Engine , 2003 .

[7]  Achille Messac,et al.  Control-structure integrated design with closed-form design metrics using physical programming , 1997 .

[8]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A decision-based approach for developing ranged top-level aircraft specifications - A conceptual exposition , 1994 .

[9]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization , 1997 .

[10]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Optimization of coupled systems : A critical overview of approaches , 1994 .

[11]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[12]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[13]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Concurrent Subspace Optimization Using Design Variable Sharing in a Distributed Computing Environment , 1996 .

[14]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative Approach to Launch Vehicle Design , 1997 .

[15]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Use of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture for Launch Vehicle Design , 1996 .

[16]  William F. Milliken,et al.  Race Car Vehicle Dynamics , 1994 .

[17]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[18]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aircraft design using collaborative optimization , 1996 .

[19]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[20]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  The other side of multidisciplinary design optimization: Accomodating a multiobjective, uncertain and non-deterministic world , 1998 .

[21]  Achille Messac,et al.  From Dubious Construction of Objective Functions to the Application of Physical Programming , 2000 .

[22]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOP LEVEL SHIP SPECIFICATIONS: A DECISION- BASED APPROACH , 1994 .

[23]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Racecar Optimization and Tradeoff Analysis in a Parallel Computing Environment , 2000 .

[24]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Implementation and Performance Issues in Collaborative Optimization , 1996 .

[25]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Implicit Uncertainty Propagation for Robust Collaborative Optimization , 2006 .

[26]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Optimization by decomposition: A step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems , 1989 .

[27]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[28]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[29]  Wei Chen,et al.  Exploration of the effectiveness of physical programming in robust design , 2000 .

[30]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  Manufacturability based optimization of aircraft structures using physical programming , 2000 .

[31]  A. Ismail-Yahaya,et al.  Multiobjective robust design using physical programming , 2002 .

[32]  Milan Zeleny.  Multiple criteria decision making : instructor's manual to accompany , 1982 .

[33]  Glynn J. Sundararaj,et al.  Ability of Objective Functions to Generate Points on Nonconvex Pareto Frontiers , 2000 .

[34]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[35]  Sowmyanarayanan Sadagopan,et al.  Interactive algorithms for multiple criteria nonlinear programming problems , 1986 .

[36]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  EXPLORING THE DESIGN TRADEOFFS AND COMPUTATIONAL SAVINGS OF EXECUTING VEHICLE SIMULATIONS IN A PARALLEL COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT , 2000 .

[37]  K. Lewis,et al.  Pareto analysis in multiobjective optimization using the collinearity theorem and scaling method , 2001 .

[38]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  GOAL PROGRAMMING APPLICATIONS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[39]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM: MODELING THE DEVIATION FUNCTION AS IN PHYSICAL PROGRAMMING , 2001 .

[40]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design , 1996 .

[41]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Execution of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approaches on Common Test Problems , 1997 .