The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) Weather Operations/RWIS program is unique among state departments of transportation nationally, as it assists the DOT operations, maintenance, and construction functions by providing detailed, often customized, area-specific weather forecasts. Staff meteorologists are stationed in the Traffic Operations Center (TOC), providing easily accessible weather information and quality control of weather forecasts. A national survey confirmed the benefits of such customized forecasts, including more accurate forecasts; timely forecasts and access to a forecaster; advanced warning of storm conditions; better response time and improved planning and scheduling of staff; and better use of chemical products. By examining the labor and materials cost for winter maintenance in the 04-05 season for 77 UDOT sheds, an artificial neural network model was trained and tested to establish the shed winter maintenance cost as a function of UDOT weather service usage, evaluation of UDOT weather service, level-of-maintenance, seasonal vehicle-miles traveled, anti-icing level, and winter severity index. The model estimated the value and additional saving potential of the UDOT weather service to be 11-25 percent and 4-10 percent of the UDOT labor and materials cost for winter maintenance, respectively. It was also estimated that the risk of using the worst weather service providers to be 58-131 percent of the UDOT labor and materials cost for winter maintenance. Further evaluation of other benefits of UDOT weather service are not included in this phase, such as better traveler information, accident reduction, value added to UDOT training and risk management, and benefits to programs outside UDOT. The research findings are expected to provide planners cost-benefit information to consider integrating weather service into their TOC or Transportation Management Center (TMC), and to provide maintenance engineers useful information about the value of customized weather service.
[1]
P Pisano.
FORETELL--FINALLY, SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THE WEATHER
,
2001
.
[2]
W. J. Steenburgh,et al.
Weather Support for the 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games
,
2002
.
[3]
Franz Rubel,et al.
Correction of synoptic precipitation observations due to systematic measuring errors with special regard to precipitation phases
,
2001
.
[4]
John L. Bignell,et al.
Measuring Efficiency of Winter Maintenance Practices
,
2001
.
[5]
S. Boselly.
Benefit/Cost Study of RWIS and Anti-icing Technologies
,
2001
.
[6]
Fred Kitchener,et al.
FINAL REPORT OF THE EVALUATION OF THE FORETELL CONSORTIUM OPERATIONAL TEST : WEATHER INFORMATION FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
,
2003
.
[7]
O Stein,et al.
Recommendations for Winter Traction Materials Management on Roadways Adjacent to Bodies of Water
,
2004
.
[8]
Peter Davies,et al.
FORETELL: PROVIDING INTEGRATED WEATHER INFORMATION SERVICES ACROSS THE UPPER MIDWEST
,
1998
.
[9]
Samuel P Williamson,et al.
Improving Surface Transportation Safety and Effectiveness Through Modern Weather Technologies and Information: An Integrated Approach to Meet User Needs
,
2005
.
[10]
Xianming Shi.
Regional Pilot Weather Information System for Surface Transportation and Incident Management
,
2006
.
[11]
Xianming Shi,et al.
Anti -icing and Pre -wetting: Improved Methods for Winter Highway Maintenance in North America
,
2006
.
[12]
Peter T. Martin,et al.
Utah RWIS Traveler Information Evaluation
,
2000
.
[13]
Xianming Shi,et al.
Applying artificial neural networks and virtual experimental design to quality improvement of two industrial processes
,
2004
.
[14]
David J. McLaughlin,et al.
Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere: New Radar System for Improving Analysis and Forecasting of Surface Weather Conditions
,
2006
.