Pruning a Decision Tree for Selecting Computer-Related Assistive Devices for People With Disabilities

Many disabled individuals lack extensive knowledge about assistive technology, which could help them use computers. In 1997, Denis Anson developed a decision tree of 49 evaluative questions designed to evaluate the functional capabilities of the disabled user and choose an appropriate combination of assistive devices, from a selection of 26, that enable the individual to use a computer. In general, occupational therapists guide the disabled users through this process. They often have to go over repetitive questions in order to find an appropriate device. A disabled user may require an alphanumeric entry device, a pointing device, an output device, a performance enhancement device, or some combination of these. Therefore, the current research eliminates redundant questions and divides Anson's decision tree into multiple independent subtrees to meet the actual demand of computer users with disabilities. The modified decision tree was tested by six disabled users to prove it can determine a complete set of assistive devices with a smaller number of evaluative questions. The means to insert new categories of computer-related assistive devices was included to ensure the decision tree can be expanded and updated. The current decision tree can help the disabled users and assistive technology practitioners to find appropriate computer-related assistive devices that meet with clients' individual needs in an efficient manner.

[1]  D. Uebelhart,et al.  Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[2]  Gilles Chatellier,et al.  Electronic implementation of guidelines in the EsPeR system: A knowledge specification method , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Denis K. Anson Alternative Computer Access: A Guide to Selection , 1997 .

[4]  Peg Lindstrand,et al.  ICT (Information and Communication Technology): A natural part of life for children with disabilities? , 2002 .

[5]  G. Gelderblom,et al.  Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview , 2004 .

[6]  J. Vanthienen,et al.  A structured approach to formalization and validation of knowledge , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Developing and Managing Expert System Programs.

[7]  Tzu-Hsin Liu,et al.  The development of a hierarchical coding scheme and database of job accommodation for disabled workers , 2004 .

[8]  P.R. Kennedy,et al.  A decision tree for brain-computer interface devices , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Harold J. Steudel,et al.  A Decision-Table-Based Processor for Checking Completeness and Consistency in Rule-Based Expert Systems , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[10]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  Development of an AT selection tool using the ICF model , 2011 .

[11]  Desleigh M De Jonge,et al.  Consumer-identified barriers and strategies for optimizing technology use in the workplace , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[12]  Tina M. Butterfield,et al.  Research and case study findings in the area of workplace accommodations including provisions for assistive technology: A literature review , 2004 .

[13]  John A. McCormick Computers and the Americans With Disabilities Act: A Manager's Guide , 1993 .

[14]  D Anson,et al.  Finding your way in the maze of computer access technology. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[15]  Chia-Fen Chi,et al.  A study on job placement for handicapped workers using job analysis data , 1999 .

[16]  T. Threats Towards an international framework for communication disorders: use of the ICF. , 2006, Journal of communication disorders.

[17]  Tin A. Nguyen,et al.  Knowledge base verification , 1987 .

[18]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Parallel formulations of decision-tree classification algorithms , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 International Conference on Parallel Processing (Cat. No.98EX205).

[19]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[20]  William C. Mann,et al.  Computer use by middle-aged and older adults with disabilities , 2005 .