Price-Induced Patterns of Competition

This research focuses on how price changes influence the observed pattern of brand competition. The paper begins with a basic utility model formulation and examines the implications of three major classes of preference distributions on the expected patterns of competition. A price-tier model is proposed to operationalize the theory and to allow predictive testing. The price-tier model is estimated on 28 brands across four product categories. The results show a specific asymmetric pattern of price competition. Higher-price, higher quality brands steal share from other brands in the same price-quality tier, as well as from brands in the tier below. However, lower-price, lower-quality brands take sales from their own tier and the tier below brands, but do not steal significant share from the tiers above. The results are consistent with a bimodal preference distribution, with the regular price indifference point being located toward the lower-quality end of the preference distribution for the categories analyzed.

[1]  Greg M. Allenby.  A Unified Approach to Identifying, Estimating and Testing Demand Structures with Aggregate Scanner Data , 1989 .

[2]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Modeling Asymmetric Competition , 1988 .

[3]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  Implications of Market Structure for Elasticity Structure , 1988 .

[4]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Market-Share Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  Steven M. Shugan.  Estimating Brand Positioning Maps Using Supermarket Scanning Data , 1987 .

[6]  Richard R. Batsell,et al.  A New Class of Market Share Models , 1985 .

[7]  K. Moorthy.  Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[8]  G. Lilien,et al.  Marketing Decision Making: A Model Building Approach , 1984 .

[9]  Hubert Gatignon,et al.  Optimal Product Line Pricing: The Influence of Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities , 1984 .

[10]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing Competitive Market Structures , 1984 .

[11]  Russell Cooper,et al.  On Allocative Distortions in Problems of Self-Selection , 1984 .

[12]  V. Rao.  Pricing Research in Marketing: The State of the Art , 1984 .

[13]  Christie H. Paksoy,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Short-Term Supermarket Strategy Variables , 1982 .

[14]  D. Wittink,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey , 1982 .

[15]  J. Hauser,et al.  Profit Maximizing Perceptual Positions: An Integrated Theory for the Selection of Product Features and Price , 1981 .

[16]  Fred S. Zufryden,et al.  Adding Explanatory Variables to a Consumer Purchase Behavior Model: An Exploratory Study , 1980 .

[17]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[18]  Clive W. J. Granger,et al.  Price as an Indicator of Quality: Report on an Enquiry , 1966 .

[19]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[20]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[21]  Gerald J. Eskin,et al.  Effects of Price and Advertising in Test-Market Experiments , 1977 .

[22]  Richard M. Johnson.  Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer Values , 1974 .

[23]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Price Promotions , 1974 .