Exploring Preferences for Transportation Modes in an Urban Air Mobility Environment: Munich Case Study

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is a recent mobility concept with the potential to reduce travel time and change travel patterns. When evaluating the introduction of UAM, understanding the potential users’ choice behavior regarding current available urban transportation modes and autonomous transportation services is essential to demand estimation. This preliminary research intends to gain insight into the travel behavior impacts of autonomous transportation modes, especially UAM, by deriving measures for transportation service attributes and identifying characteristics of potential users who might adopt autonomous transportation services, particularly the services of UAM. Thus, a stated preference questionnaire was designed and distributed in Munich metropolitan region. A main mode choice multinomial logit model and several sub-models, based on market segmentation, were estimated regarding four transportation alternatives: private car, public transportation, autonomous taxi, and autonomous flying taxi. The results indicate that travel time, travel cost, and safety may be critical determinants in autonomous transportation mode adoption. The potential consumers may be willing to pay more for using autonomous transportation modes, especially the service of UAM. Among different market segments, younger individuals, as well as older individuals with high household income, are more likely to adopt UAM. In addition, during the market entry stage, potential travelers may favor UAM particularly for performing non-commuting trips.

[1]  R. Rothfeld,et al.  Identification of Relevant Aspects for Personal Air Transport System Integration in Urban Mobility Modelling , 2017 .

[2]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Values of travel time in Europe: Review and meta-analysis , 2016 .

[3]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The impacts of road pricing on route and mode choice behaviour , 2010 .

[4]  Vidal Díaz de Rada Igúzquiza,et al.  Internet, Phone, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Don A. Dillman, Jolene D. Smyth y Leah Melani Christian. (New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons, 2014) , 2016 .

[5]  Ichm Ilse Megens Vehicle users' preferences concerning automated driving:implications for transportation and market planning , 2014 .

[6]  The CBC System for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis , 2013 .

[7]  Alexis M. Fillone,et al.  TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE MODELS FOR METRO MANILA AND URBAN TRANSPORT POLICY APPLICATIONS , 2007 .

[8]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Mobility on Demand Operational Concept Report , 2017 .

[9]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[10]  M. Wardman,et al.  Disaggregate Inter-Urban Mode Choice Models: A review of British Evidence with special Reference to Cross Elasticities. , 1997 .

[11]  Maria Johansson,et al.  The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice , 2006 .

[12]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[13]  K. Martens,et al.  A Stated-Choice Experiment on Mode Choice in an Era of Free-Floating Carsharing and Shared Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[14]  S. Baxter,et al.  Professional differences in interprofessional working , 2008, Journal of interprofessional care.

[15]  Jian L. Zhou,et al.  User's Guide for CFSQP Version 2.0: A C Code for Solving (Large Scale) Constrained Nonlinear (Minimax) Optimization Problems, Generating Iterates Satisfying All Inequality Constraints , 1994 .

[16]  Frank M. Nieuwenhuizen,et al.  Deliverable D6.5 Final list of desirable features/options for the PAV and supporting systems , 2015 .

[17]  Todd Litman,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions: Implications for Transport Planning , 2015 .

[18]  Vincent A. C. van den Berg,et al.  New values of time and reliability in passenger transport in The Netherlands , 2014 .

[19]  Danielle Dai,et al.  Public Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California , 2014 .

[20]  Stephan Keuchel,et al.  Modelling mode choice in passenger transport with integrated hierarchical information integration , 2012 .

[21]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[22]  Rico Krueger,et al.  Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[23]  Shlomo Angel,et al.  “Making Room for a Planet of Cities” , 2011 .

[24]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles , 2017 .

[25]  Rohit Goyal,et al.  Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Market Study , 2018 .

[26]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[27]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Mode choice with attitudinal latent class: a Swiss case-study , 2011 .

[28]  P. Waddell,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers , 2013 .

[29]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[30]  Jolene D. Smyth,et al.  Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys , 2014 .

[31]  Fast-Forwarding to a Future of On-Demand Urban Air Transportation , 2016 .