Analysis and Validation of Ultrasonic Probes in Liquid Level Monitoring Systems

Selecting and designing the optimum ultrasonic probe is vital for ultrasonic measurements and experiments. The amplitude of the emitted ultrasonic wave excitation signal as well as the diameter and the natural frequency of the probe seriously affect the validity of the probe results. In this paper, we analyze the significance of the key parameters of the ultrasonic probe theoretically. Further, an external fixed-point liquid level monitoring system was assembled according to the principle of ultrasonic reflection and transmission. On this experimental platform, we study the key parameters of the ultrasonic probe that affect the system evaluation through a simulation and experiment, and select the optimal sensor parameters for this experiment. The evaluations show that under the experimental conditions where the tested container is made of aluminum alloy and its wall thickness is 3 mm, the best results are obtained when the diameter of the ultrasonic sensor is 15 mm, the amplitude of the emitted excitation signal is ±15 V, and the frequency is 1 MHz. The results’ average deviation is less than ±0.22 V. The evaluations are consistent with the simulation results. This research can effectively monitor the liquid in the closed, ultra-thin-walled container, and can realize non-contact measurement. It provides an effective basis for the parameters selection and design of the ultrasonic probe in the ultrasonic-based experiments and tests.

[1]  A. Moghanizadeh,et al.  Effect of heat treatment on an AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel evaluated by the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient , 2016 .

[2]  F. Cohen Tenoudji,et al.  Non-contact ultrasonic defect imaging in composites , 2016 .

[3]  K. Mizutani,et al.  Reconstruction of Three-Dimensional Sound Field from Two-Dimensional Sound Field Using Optical Computerized Tomography and Near-Field Acoustical Holography , 2009 .

[4]  David A. Hutchins,et al.  Non-contact ultrasonic quality measurements of food products , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Liu,et al.  Wave reflection and transmission by porous breakwaters: A new analytical solution , 2013 .

[6]  R P B Costa-Félix,et al.  Monte Carlo uncertainty assessment of ultrasonic beam parameters from immersion transducers used to non-destructive testing. , 2016, Ultrasonics.

[7]  Mohd Amri Md Yunus,et al.  Contact and non-contact ultrasonic measurement in the food industry: a review , 2015 .

[8]  Hao Hao-hao,et al.  A method of liquid level measurement based on ultrasonic echo characteristics , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010).

[9]  Wenyi Liu,et al.  Study of Ultrasonic Near-Field Region in Ultrasonic Liquid-Level Monitoring System , 2020, Micromachines.

[10]  Luo Yu-mei.  Research and Design on an Intelligent Level Measurement System , 2009 .

[11]  Yang-Chen Zheng,et al.  Directional fiber-optic level meter based on a micro-air-bubble drifted in a liquid core fiber Fabry-Pérot interferometer , 2013, CLEO: 2013.

[12]  Y. Tasinkevych,et al.  Wave generation and scattering by periodic baffle system in application to beam-forming analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Noncontact ultrasonics used for impact damage detection on long-term water-immersed GFRP composites , 2009 .

[14]  Shiwei Li,et al.  A method of the untouched ultrasonic liquid level measurement with high precision , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM 2010).

[15]  Jose M. Campos-Martin,et al.  Oxidative processes of desulfurization of liquid fuels , 2010 .

[16]  Adam Pilch,et al.  Comparison of Pressure and Intensity Methods in Evaluating the Directional Diffusion Coefficient , 2013 .

[17]  T. Shrout,et al.  [111]-oriented PIN-PMN-PT crystals with ultrahigh dielectric permittivity and high frequency constant for high-frequency transducer applications , 2016 .

[18]  Amit Pal,et al.  Capacitive Sensor for Level Measurement in Hopper/Silos - Experimental Evaluation , 2019, 2019 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT).

[19]  Bin Zhang,et al.  A Liquid Level Measurement Technique Outside a Sealed Metal Container Based on Ultrasonic Impedance and Echo Energy , 2017, Sensors.

[20]  Peter Hauptmann,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Application of ultrasonic sensors in the process industry , 2002 .

[21]  S. Joshi,et al.  Liquid level sensor using ultrasonic Lamb waves. , 2003, Ultrasonics.

[22]  Mariani Idroas,et al.  Ultrasonic instrumentation system for Liquefied Petroleum Gas level monitoring , 2017 .

[23]  F. Arnold,et al.  The influence of the thickness of non-piezoelectric pieces on pre-stressed piezotransducers. , 2003, Ultrasonics.

[24]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Liquid Level Measurement Model Outside of Closed Containers Based on Continuous Sound Wave Amplitude , 2018, Sensors.

[25]  Brian R. Mace,et al.  Real-time measurement of wave components and intensity in a beam in the presence of a near field , 2005 .

[26]  Gerrit Vermeir,et al.  Measuring the free field acoustic impedance and absorption coefficient of sound absorbing materials with a combined particle velocity-pressure sensor , 2006 .

[27]  Lei Chen,et al.  Development of a Ultrasonic Instrument for the Sealed Container's Liquid Level Measurement , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.