We Built This House; It’s Time to Move in: Leveraging Existing DICOM Structure to More Completely Utilize Readily Available Detailed Contrast Administration Information

The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard is the universal format for interoperability in medical imaging. In addition to imaging data, DICOM has evolved to support a wide range of imaging metadata including contrast administration data that is readily available from many modern contrast injectors. Contrast agent, route of administration, start and stop time, volume, flow rate, and duration can be recorded using DICOM attributes [1]. While this information is sparsely and inconsistently recorded in routine clinical practice, it could potentially be of significant diagnostic value. This work will describe parameters recorded by automatic contrast injectors, summarize the DICOM mechanisms available for tracking contrast injection data, and discuss the role of such data in clinical radiology.

[1]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  RADIANCE: An automated, enterprise-wide solution for archiving and reporting CT radiation dose estimates. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Prospective study of access site complications of automated contrast injection with peripheral venous access in MDCT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Patient-tailored scan delay for multiphase liver CT: improved scan quality and lesion conspicuity with a novel timing bolus method. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Gosselin,et al.  Contrast Dynamics During CT Pulmonary Angiogram: Analysis of an Inspiration Associated Artifact , 2004, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[5]  Nicole Wake,et al.  Iodinated contrast injection data from a new technology. , 2012, Radiologic technology.

[6]  K. Bae,et al.  Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. , 2010, Radiology.

[7]  D. Sahani,et al.  Comparison of Enhancement, Image Quality, Cost, and Adverse Reactions Using 2 Different Contrast Medium Concentrations for Routine Chest CT on 16-Slice MDCT , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Christian Czerny,et al.  Suspected pulmonary embolism: enhancement of pulmonary arteries at deep-inspiration CT angiography--influence of patent foramen ovale and atrial-septal defect. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  Xiaozhou Ma,et al.  Comparison of dual-syringe and syringeless power injectors in outpatient MDCT practice: impact on the operator's performance, CT workflow, and operation cost. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[10]  K. Shojania,et al.  National Patient Safety Goals. , 2006, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.