Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction: Reply

This paper attempts to evaluate the undrained shear strength of sand during flow failures, based on both laboratory testing and field observations. In the laboratory, the minimum shear resistance during monotonic loading was taken as the undrained strength, based on the criterion of stability. Triaxial compression, triaxial extension, and simple shear test data on clean sand were examined and it was revealed that the undrained shear strength ratio could be related to the relative density of the material provided that the initial stress, piprime, was less than 500 kPa. Three previous flow failures involving sand layers with relatively low fines contents and reliable cone penetration test (CPT) data were studied. Using existing calibration chamber test results, the Toyoura sand specimen densities in the laboratory tests were converted to equivalent values of CPT penetration resistance. The undrained shear strengths measured in the laboratory for Toyoura sand were compared with those from the case studies. I...

[1]  I. Towhata,et al.  Flow Failure of Saturated Sand under Simultaneous Monotonic and Cyclic Stresses , 2000 .

[2]  N. Morgenstern,et al.  Seabed instability due to flow liquefaction in the Fraser River delta , 1997 .

[3]  K. Ishihara Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. , 1993 .

[4]  Yukio Nakata,et al.  FLOW DEFORMATION OF SANDS SUBJECTED TO PRINCIPAL STRESS ROTATION , 1998 .

[5]  Y P Vaid,et al.  Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading , 1998 .

[6]  Yasuo Yamada,et al.  Undrained Deformation Characteristics of Loose Sand Under Three-Dimensional Stress Conditions , 1981 .

[7]  H. Poorooshasb Description of flow of sand using state parameters , 1989 .

[8]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Liquefaction at Moss Landing during Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1999 .

[9]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Seismic cone penetration test for evaluating liquefaction potential under cyclic loading , 1992 .

[10]  P K Robertson,et al.  CYCLIC LIQUEFACTION AND ITS EVALUATION BASED ON THE SPT AND CPT , 1997 .

[11]  Renato Lancellotta,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING OF SOILS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, SAN FRANCISCO, 12-16 AUGUST 1985 , 1985 .

[12]  L. Bjerrum,et al.  Embankments on Soft Ground , 1973 .

[13]  J. A. Sladen,et al.  Back analysis of the Nerlerk berm liquefaction slides , 1985 .

[14]  Kenji Ishihara,et al.  THE STEADY STATE OF SANDY SOILS , 1996 .

[15]  R. H. Kuerbis,et al.  STRESS PATH AND STEADY STATE , 1990 .

[16]  Jerry A. Yamamuro,et al.  STEADY-STATE CONCEPTS AND STATIC LIQUEFACTION OF SILTY SANDS , 1998 .

[17]  Jerry A. Yamamuro,et al.  Effects of nonplastic fines on static liquefaction of sands , 1997 .

[18]  J.-M. Konrad,et al.  Undrained shear strength for liquefaction flow failure analysis , 1995 .

[19]  S. Thevanayagam,et al.  Effect of Fines and Confining Stress on Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Sands , 1999 .

[20]  Antonio Gens,et al.  LIQUEFACTION WITH CYCLIC PRINCIPAL STRESS ROTATION. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANCIS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, SAN FRANCISCO, 12-16 AUGUST 1985 , 1985 .

[21]  Kenji Ishihara,et al.  FLOW POTENTIAL OF SAND DURING LIQUEFACTION , 1998 .

[22]  D. Chan,et al.  The CANLEX project: summary and conclusions , 2000 .

[23]  G. Deodatis,et al.  EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY ON SOIL LIQUEFACTION: SOME DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS , 1997 .

[24]  R. Kostaschuk,et al.  Large-scale mass-wasting events on the Fraser River delta front near Sand Heads, British Columbia , 1992 .

[25]  Ikuo Towhata,et al.  LIQUEFACTION-INDUCED GROUND DAMAGE IN DAGUPAN IN THE JULY 16, 1990 LUZON EARTHQUAKE , 1993 .

[26]  G Mesri,et al.  Closure of "Undrained Shear Strength of Liquefied Sands for Stability Analysis" , 1992 .

[27]  Mitsutoshi Yoshimine Quasi-steady state: a real behavior?: Discussion , 1999 .

[28]  Kenji Ishihara,et al.  Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behavior of sand. , 1998 .

[29]  Gonzalo Castro,et al.  Liquefaction of sands , 1969 .

[30]  P. Robertson,et al.  Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test , 1998 .

[31]  P K Robertson,et al.  Reconsideration of case histories for estimating undrained shear strength in sandy soils , 1999 .

[32]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Estimating the undrained strength of sand: a theoretical framework , 1995 .

[33]  Y. Nakata,et al.  UNDRAINED AND DRAINED SHEAR BEHAVIOUR OF INHERENT ANISOTROPIC SAND REFERENCE TO FIXED PRINCIPAL STRESS DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[34]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[35]  Gonzalo Castro,et al.  Liquefaction Evaluation Procedure , 1985 .

[36]  K. J. Hewitt,et al.  Influence of placement method on the in situ density of hydraulic sand fills , 1989 .

[37]  R. Verdugo,et al.  Characterization of sandy soil behavior under large deformation , 1992 .

[38]  P. Robertson,et al.  Site investigations to evaluate flow liquefaction slides at Sand Heads, Fraser River delta , 1997 .

[39]  Steve J. Poulos,et al.  THE STEADY STATE OF DEFORMATION , 1981 .

[40]  Allen Hazen,et al.  Hydraulic-Fill Dams , 1919 .

[41]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Design Problems in Soil Liquefaction , 1987 .