Defining and Measuring Quality in Online Discussions

In support of research examining relationships between learner characteristics and the quality of online discussions, this paper surveys different methods for evaluating discussions. The paper will present coding methods used in our own research as well as methods used by others interested in quality online discussions. Key topics include what constitutes quality in online discussions and how that quality can be measured?

[1]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses , 1996 .

[2]  Tom McKlin,et al.  Cognitive Presence in Web-Based Learning: A Content Analysis of Students' Online Discussions. , 2001 .

[3]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[4]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Enhancing the Quality of On-Line Discussions , 2002 .

[5]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis , 1999, CSCL.

[6]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation , 1999, CSCL.

[7]  R. Selman.  growth of interpersonal understanding , 1980 .

[8]  Jennifer Peterson-Lewinson,et al.  Facilitating the process of knowledge construction among preservice teachers through computer-mediated communications , 2002, International Conference on Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings..

[9]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom: The Realities of Online Teaching , 2001 .

[10]  Evonne Schaeffer,et al.  Online Debate To Encourage Peer Interactions in the Large Lecture Setting: Coding and Analysis of Forum Activity. , 2002 .

[11]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Electronic Mail as a Forum for Argumentative Interaction in Higher Education Studies , 1998 .

[12]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[13]  S. Järvelä,et al.  The Levels of Web-Based Discussions: Using Perspective Taking Theory as an Analytical Tool , 2003 .