The Extra Load Index as a method for comparing the relative economy of load carriage systems

The Extra Load Index (ELI) has been proposed as a suitable method of assessing the relative economy of load carriage systems. The purpose of this study was to determine, based on empirical evidence, that the ELI can accommodate variations in both body composition and added load. In total, 30 women walked carrying loads of up to 70% body mass at self-selected walking speeds whilst expired air was collected. In addition, each of the women had body composition assessed via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results show that the ELI is independent of body composition variables, the magnitude of additional loads and the speed of progression. Consequently, it is suggested that it represents an appropriate method of comparing load carriage systems in both scientific and commercial arenas. Statement of Relevance:This paper demonstrates that ELI is independent of body composition, added load and speed and is therefore an appropriate method to generalise comparisons of load carriage systems. It has the advantage of being easily understood by manufacturers and consumers whilst retaining appropriate scientific precision.

[1]  B. Goslin,et al.  Comparison between load carriage and grade walking on a treadmill. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[2]  R. Whitehead,et al.  FATNESS AND THE ENERGY COST OF CARRYING LOADS IN AFRICAN WOMEN , 1987, The Lancet.

[3]  Ray Lloyd,et al.  No 'free ride' for African women: a comparison of head-loading versus back-loading among Xhosa women , 2010 .

[4]  L. Garby,et al.  Effect of trunk load on the energy expenditure of treadmill walking and ergometer cycling , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[5]  M F Haisman,et al.  Determinants of load carrying ability. , 1988, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  K. R. Williams,et al.  The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  R. Kram,et al.  Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  J. Bilzon,et al.  Influences of body composition upon the relative metabolic and cardiovascular demands of load-carriage. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[9]  E Kamon,et al.  The Physiological Cost of Carrying Loads in Temperate and Hot Environments , 1971, Human factors.

[10]  S. Simon,et al.  Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching , 2000, Ergonomics.

[11]  D. Abe,et al.  Effects of load carriage, load position, and walking speed on energy cost of walking. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  P. E. Martin,et al.  Biomechanical considerations for economical walking and running. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  P. Willems,et al.  Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[14]  R G Soule,et al.  Energy cost of loads carried on the head, hands, or feet. , 1969, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  R Lloyd,et al.  The oxygen consumption associated with unloaded walking and load carriage using two different backpack designs. , 2000, European journal of applied physiology.

[16]  Inseok Lee,et al.  Physiological workload evaluation of carrying soft drink beverage boxes on the back. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  K Francis,et al.  Changes in oxygen consumption associated with treadmill walking and running with light hand-carried weights. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[18]  R. Marsh,et al.  The energetic costs of trunk and distal-limb loading during walking and running in guinea fowl Numida meleagris , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Jonas Rubenson,et al.  The energetic costs of trunk and distal-limb loading during walking and running in guinea fowl Numida meleagris , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  Forecasting electricity demand in South Africa: A critique of Eskom’s projections , 1970 .

[21]  R. Lloyd,et al.  Biomechanical differences associated with two different load carriage systems and their relationship to economy , 2011 .

[22]  R J Robertson,et al.  Metabolic and perceptual responses while carrying external loads on the head and by yoke. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[23]  T. McMahon,et al.  Energetic Cost of Generating Muscular Force During Running: A Comparison of Large and Small Animals , 1980 .

[24]  R N Sen,et al.  Cardio-respiratory performance of porters carrying loads on a treadmill. , 1979, Ergonomics.

[25]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Effects of moderate external loading on the aerobic demand of submaximal running in men and 10 year-old boys , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[26]  J. Bilzon,et al.  Assessment of physical fitness for occupations encompassing load-carriage tasks. , 2001, Occupational medicine.

[27]  S J Legg,et al.  Comparison of five modes of carrying a load close to the trunk. , 1985, Ergonomics.