MULTI-POINT AIRFOIL OPTIMIZATION USING EVOLUTION STRATEGIES

The considered multi-point (multi-objective) optimization problem is charac- terized by a multi-modal, nonlinear topology and a highly sophisticated evaluation of the objective function, thus requiring an efficient, direct global optimization algorithm. Evolution strategies have shown their capabilities for solving complex optimization prob- lems with continuous variables in a variety of applications. This paper reports on the application of evolution strategies to an airfoil optimization problem. The objective func- tion which holds for this test case is described by the difference in pressure described for the different design points of an airfoil compared to predefined airfoil shapes and the cor- responding pressure distribution. The design conditions for the two-point optimization problem involve a typical subsonic high-lift and a typical transonic low-drag airfoil. In particular, results for different algorithmic variants are presented. Some emphasis is put on the reduction of the number of function evaluations required for the algorithm. The results will include an assessment according to the influence of different geometry- parameterization strategies and the dependence of CFD mesh fineness. The CFD analysis utilized a full Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach in order to achieve an accurate prediction of the different flowtypes involved.

[1]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary computation: comments on the history and current state , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[2]  D. Fogel Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice , 1997, Complex..

[3]  Jacques Periaux,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science , 1996 .

[4]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolution and optimum seeking , 1995, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[5]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Step-Size Adaption Based on Non-Local Use of Selection Information , 1994, PPSN.

[6]  Kyriacos D. Papailiou,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics '98 , 1998 .

[7]  Jacques Periaux,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design & Parallel Navier-Stokes Computations ECARP — European Computational Aerodynamics Research Project , 1998 .

[8]  D. Heiss-Czedik An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[9]  Jeffrey Horn,et al.  Handbook of evolutionary computation , 1997 .

[10]  Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, EP 1996, San Diego, CA, USA, February 29 - March 2, 1996 , 1996 .

[11]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  Reinhard Männer,et al.  Parallel problem solving from nature--PPSN III : International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, the Third Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Jerusalem, Israel, October 9-14, 1994 : proceedings , 1994 .

[13]  N. Hansen,et al.  Step-Size Adaptation Based on Non-Local Use Selection Information , 1994 .

[14]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[15]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[16]  K. Dejong,et al.  An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems , 1975 .

[17]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[18]  Kenneth Alan De Jong,et al.  An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. , 1975 .

[19]  Ingo Rechenberg,et al.  Evolutionsstrategie : Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution , 1973 .