Generation of Coherent Trip Chains for Travel Behavior Analysis and Modeling

The generation of trip chains from National Household Travel Surveys (NHTS), frequently used both directly for data analysis as well as input for transport modeling, usually demands substantial post-processing. Transport models are highly dependent on information on the location type associated with each trip for the proper assignment and consequently estimation of transport flows between origins and destinations. Unfortunately, many NHTS only provide trip purposes without information about specific location types, especially in case of purposes such as ‘pick up / drop off someone’ or ‘accompanying adults’. Based on the German NHTS ‘MiD 2008 – Mobilitaet in Deutschland’, a step-wise method of data processing is introduced to specify reported locations by investigating the complex household context in which activity and trip planning took place. The step-wise identification of specific location sites considering the household context allows for the generation of additional 11% of qualified trip chains compared to the original data set, thus substantially enhancing the explanatory power of chain-based empirical analysis. Comparing the effect of different recoding schemes, it can be demonstrated that a systematic consideration of the household context proved most effective for joint trips of adults and children. Detailed recommendations are made to overcome the mainly design-based shortcomings of non-located trip purposes in future NHTS.

[1]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Activity–Travel Behaviour Research: Conceptual Issues, State of the Art, and Emerging Perspectives on Behavioural Analysis and Simulation Modelling , 2007 .

[2]  J. Strathman,et al.  Effects of household structure and selected travel characteristics on trip chaining , 1994 .

[3]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Household Travel Surveys: Proposed Standards and Guidelines , 2006 .

[4]  Michael A. P. Taylor,et al.  Defining and understanding trip chaining behaviour , 2007 .

[5]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL MODEL OF TRIP CHAINING BEHAVIOR , 1979 .

[6]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions , 1998 .

[7]  Xin Ye,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns , 2007 .

[8]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Standardized Procedures for Personal Travel Surveys , 2008 .

[9]  Joel Freedman,et al.  Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modeling , 2007 .

[10]  R Kitamura,et al.  1990 NPTS REPORT SERIES: SPECIAL REPORTS ON TRIP AND VEHICLE ATTRIBUTES. BASED ON DATA FROM THE 1990 NATIONWIDE PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY (NPTS) , 1995 .

[11]  D. Hensher,et al.  The Trip Chaining Activity of Sydney Residents: A Cross- Section Assessment by Age Group with a focus on Seniors , 2007 .

[12]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Handbook of Transport Modelling , 2000 .

[13]  Peter R. Stopher Travel Survey Methods , 2006 .

[14]  Graham Currie,et al.  Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne , 2011 .

[15]  H. E. Strate NATIONWIDE PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY , 1972 .

[16]  L. Frank,et al.  Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice , 2007 .

[17]  Kazuo Nishii,et al.  EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF TRIP CHAINING BEHAVIOR , 1988 .

[18]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: an international comparison , 2003 .