Combination Early-Phase Trials of Anticancer Agents in Children and Adolescents

PURPOSE There is an increasing need to evaluate innovative drugs for childhood cancer using combination strategies. Strong biological rationale and clinical experience suggest that multiple agents will be more efficacious than monotherapy for most diseases and may overcome resistance mechanisms and increase synergy. The process to evaluate these combination trials needs to maximize efficiency and should be agreed by all stakeholders. METHODS After a review of existing combination trial methodologies, regulatory requirements, and current results, a consensus among stakeholders was achieved. RESULTS Combinations of anticancer therapies should be developed on the basis of mechanism of action and robust preclinical evaluation, and may include data from adult clinical trials. The general principle for combination early-phase studies is that, when possible, clinical trials should be dose- and schedule-confirmatory rather than dose-exploratory, and every effort should be made to optimize doses early. Efficient early-phase combination trials should be seamless, including dose confirmation and randomized expansion. Dose evaluation designs for combinations depend on the extent of previous knowledge. If not previously evaluated, limited evaluation of monotherapy should be included in the same clinical trial as the combination. Randomized evaluation of a new agent plus standard therapy versus standard therapy is the most effective approach to isolate the effect and toxicity of the novel agent. Platform trials may be valuable in the evaluation of combination studies. Patient advocates and regulators should be engaged with investigators early in a proposed clinical development pathway and trial design must consider regulatory requirements. CONCLUSION An optimized, agreed approach to the design and evaluation of early-phase pediatric combination trials will accelerate drug development and benefit all stakeholders, most importantly children and adolescents with cancer.

[1]  C. Pratilas,et al.  Entrectinib in children and young adults with solid or primary CNS tumors harboring NTRK, ROS1, or ALK aberrations (STARTRK-NG) , 2022, Neuro-oncology.

[2]  P. Kearns,et al.  ACCELERATE - Five years accelerating cancer drug development for children and adolescents. , 2022, European journal of cancer.

[3]  P. Hinds,et al.  Recommended scoring approach for the pediatric patient‐reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events , 2021, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[4]  S. Raimondi,et al.  Assessment of Arsenic Trioxide and All-trans Retinoic Acid for the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group AAML1331 Trial. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[5]  B. Morland,et al.  Phase I/II study of single-agent lenvatinib in children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid malignancies and young adults with osteosarcoma (ITCC-050)☆ , 2021, ESMO open.

[6]  N. André,et al.  First-in-child phase I/II study of the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor vistusertib (AZD2014) as monotherapy and in combination with topotecan-temozolomide in children with advanced malignancies: arms E and F of the AcSé-ESMART trial. , 2021, European journal of cancer.

[7]  K. Winter,et al.  An Overview of Phase II Clinical Trial Designs. , 2021, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  D. Wendler,et al.  Do the Potential Medical Benefits of Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Trials Justify the Risks? Views of the US Public. , 2021, The Journal of pediatrics.

[9]  J. O'Quigley,et al.  Randomised Phase 1 clinical trials in oncology , 2021, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Evolution of the Randomized Clinical Trial in the Era of Precision Oncology. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[11]  O. Hrusak,et al.  Effect of Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Event-Free Survival Among Children With High-risk First-Relapse B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA.

[12]  M. Loh,et al.  Effect of Postreinduction Therapy Consolidation With Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy on Disease-Free Survival in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With First Relapse of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA.

[13]  J. Fine,et al.  Consistency of the CRM when the dose‐toxicity curve is not monotone and its application to the POCRM , 2021, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  C. Bellera,et al.  Optimal biological dose: a systematic review in cancer phase I clinical trials , 2021, BMC cancer.

[15]  R. Bernards,et al.  Phase I Study of Afatinib and Selumetinib in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Colorectal, Non-Small Cell Lung, and Pancreatic Cancer. , 2020, The oncologist.

[16]  J. Foster,et al.  Evaluation of the contribution of randomised cancer clinical trials evaluating agents without documented single-agent activity , 2020, ESMO Open.

[17]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Histology-agnostic drug development — considering issues beyond the tissue , 2020, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[18]  M. Ratain,et al.  Interventional Pharmacoeconomics: A Novel Mechanism for Unlocking Value. , 2020, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[19]  R. Bernards,et al.  Phase I study of lapatinib plus trametinib in patients with KRAS-mutant colorectal, non-small cell lung, and pancreatic cancer , 2020, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[20]  R. Bernards,et al.  Phase 1 study of the pan-HER inhibitor dacomitinib plus the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-0325901 in patients with KRAS-mutation-positive colorectal, non-small-cell lung and pancreatic cancer , 2020, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  Cheng Cheng,et al.  Effect of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in the Treatment of Pediatric Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[22]  G. Armstrong,et al.  Life Expectancy of Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer Over 3 Decades. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[23]  J. Kimmelman,et al.  Benefit, burden, and impact for a cohort of post-approval cancer combination trials , 2020, Clinical trials.

[24]  J. Reid,et al.  Phase 1/2 trial of talazoparib in combination with temozolomide in children and adolescents with refractory/recurrent solid tumors including Ewing sarcoma: A Children's Oncology Group Phase 1 Consortium study (ADVL1411) , 2019, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[25]  X. Paoletti,et al.  Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study , 2019, Clinical trials.

[26]  Herman Goossens,et al.  Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations , 2019, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  M. Ratain,et al.  Interventional Pharmacoeconomics-A New Discipline for a Cost-Constrained Environment. , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[28]  Dylan V Neel,et al.  Timing of first-in-child trials of FDA-approved oncology drugs. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[29]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  A New Framework for Patient Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Studies , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  M. Loh,et al.  Accelerating drug development in pediatric cancer: a novel Phase I study design of venetoclax in relapsed/refractory malignancies. , 2018, Future oncology.

[31]  F. Peale,et al.  Phase I study of the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor GDC-0575 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[32]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Combination Cancer Therapy Can Confer Benefit via Patient-to-Patient Variability without Drug Additivity or Synergy , 2017, Cell.

[33]  X. Paoletti,et al.  Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium. , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[34]  P. Hieter,et al.  Synthetic lethality and cancer , 2017, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  S. Pfister,et al.  Early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents in children and adolescents — an ITCC perspective , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Gudrun Schleiermacher,et al.  Implementation of mechanism of action biology-driven early drug development for children with cancer. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[37]  M. Schrappe,et al.  Creating a unique, multi-stakeholder Paediatric Oncology Platform to improve drug development for children and adolescents with cancer. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[38]  K. Stelzer,et al.  A Phase III study of radiation therapy (RT) and O6-benzylguanine + BCNU versus RT and BCNU alone and methylation status in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and gliosarcoma: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study S0001 , 2015, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Andreas Schlicker,et al.  Intrinsic resistance to MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant lung and colon cancer through transcriptional induction of ERBB3. , 2014, Cell reports.

[40]  N. Heerema,et al.  Philadelphia chromosome-negative very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: results from Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL0031 , 2014, Leukemia.

[41]  A. Baruchel,et al.  A comparative analysis of paediatric dose-finding trials of molecularly targeted agent with adults' trials. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[42]  John O'Quigley,et al.  Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations , 2011, Clinical trials.

[43]  S. Joffe,et al.  Benefit in phase 1 oncology trials: therapeutic misconception or reasonable treatment option? , 2008, Clinical trials.

[44]  Sin-Ho Jung,et al.  Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[45]  D. Sargent,et al.  Pick the winner designs in phase II cancer clinical trials. , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[46]  D. Frappaz,et al.  Phase I trial and pharmacological study of a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in children with refractory solid tumours: a SFOP study , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[47]  R Simon,et al.  Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[48]  P F Thall,et al.  An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[49]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.