Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities

This qualitative investigation makes suggestions about creating age-friendly cities for older adults focusing on three domains of the World Health Organization (WHO) age-friendly city framework namely “Communication and Information”, “Outdoor Spaces and Buildings” and “Social Participation”. The authors present two case studies, the first one focusing on older adults using activity wearables for health self-management in the neighborhood, and the second one focusing on older adults engaged in social prescribing activities in the community. The authors then reflect on the relationships of the domains and future opportunities for age-friendly cities. These case studies apply a co-design and citizen-based approach focusing within these larger frameworks on emotions, values and motivational goals of older adults. Results suggest how the convergence of the often siloed age-friendly city components based on older adults’ goals and input can lead to better social participation and longer-term health outcomes. The authors propose that the digital, physical and social aspects need to be considered in all domains of age-friendly cities to achieve benefits for older adults. Further work involving older adults in the future shaping of age-friendly neighborhoods and cities, and identifying barriers and opportunities is required.

[1]  Ubiquity staff An Interview with Michael Schrage on Ubiquity , 2008, UBIQ.

[2]  Leon Sterling,et al.  The Art of Agent-Oriented Modeling , 2009 .

[3]  Leon Sterling,et al.  Understanding socially oriented roles and goals through motivational modelling , 2012, J. Syst. Softw..

[4]  James Marshall,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling of Emotional Goals in Digital Media Design Projects , 2014, Int. J. People Oriented Program..

[5]  E. Greenfield,et al.  Age-friendly community initiatives: conceptual issues and key questions. , 2015, The Gerontologist.

[6]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  The effect of an information and communication technology (ICT) on older adults’ quality of life: study protocol for a randomized control trial , 2015, Trials.

[7]  R. Kimberlee What is social prescribing , 2015 .

[8]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Older Adults’ Experiences Using a Commercially Available Monitor to Self-Track Their Physical Activity , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[9]  Matthias Schroder,et al.  The Learning Healthcare System Workshop Summary , 2016 .

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Understanding the role of contrasting urban contexts in healthy aging: an international cohort study using wearable sensor devices (the CURHA study protocol) , 2016, BMC Geriatrics.

[11]  M. Bertotti,et al.  Making Sense of Social Prescribing , 2017 .

[12]  Peer Review Effects of a museum-based social prescription intervention on quantitative measures of psychological wellbeing in older adults , 2017 .

[13]  Loris Caruso,et al.  Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes? , 2017, AI & SOCIETY.

[14]  Joon Lee,et al.  Smart Devices for Older Adults Managing Chronic Disease: A Scoping Review , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[15]  M. Bertotti,et al.  The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[16]  J. Broeder,et al.  Citizen Science for Health in all Policies: Engaging communities in knowledge development , 2017 .

[17]  Nicola O'Brien,et al.  Link Worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions , 2017, BMJ Open.

[18]  E. Cerin,et al.  Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[19]  Y. Gschwind,et al.  Digital Game Technology and Older Adults , 2017 .

[20]  S. Peek,et al.  The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[21]  K. Gray,et al.  Consumer Wearable Information and Health Self Management by Older Adults. , 2018, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[22]  S. Cinderby,et al.  Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being , 2018, Journal of Urban Health.

[23]  Gina Sprint,et al.  Using Smart City Technology to Make Healthcare Smarter , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[24]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[25]  A. King,et al.  Older Adults Using Our Voice Citizen Science to Create Change in Their Neighborhood Environment , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  M. C. D. Haan,et al.  What moves you? Designing a walking app for and with older adults , 2018 .

[27]  J. van Hoof,et al.  “Who Doesn’t Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?” A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities Model , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[28]  J. Wilbanks,et al.  The Rise of Citizen Science in Health and Biomedical Research , 2019, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[29]  R. Byng,et al.  What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review , 2019, Health & social care in the community.

[30]  S. Cotten,et al.  The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[31]  F. Braddick,et al.  Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review , 2019, Current Environmental Health Reports.

[32]  Å. Revenäs,et al.  Technology-Based Motivation Support for Seniors’ Physical Activity—A Qualitative Study on Seniors’ and Health Care Professionals’ Views , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[33]  H. Huyse,et al.  Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp , 2019 .

[34]  Manuel Ottaviano,et al.  Empowering Citizens through Perceptual Sensing of Urban Environmental and Health Data Following a Participative Citizen Science Approach , 2019, Sensors.

[35]  S. Klein,et al.  Mobility among older adults: Deconstructing the effects of motility and movement on wellbeing , 2019, Urban Studies.

[36]  A. Sixsmith,et al.  Mobilizing mHealth Data Collection in Older Adults: Challenges and Opportunities , 2019, JMIR aging.

[37]  Ann Borda Citizen Science Models in Health Research: an Australian Commentary. , 2019, Online journal of public health informatics.

[38]  Rupa S. Valdez,et al.  Citizen science to further precision medicine: from vision to implementation , 2019, JAMIA open.

[39]  M. Gray,et al.  Using technology-enabled social prescriptions to disrupt healthcare , 2020, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[40]  Health Canada , 2020, The Grants Register 2021.

[41]  O. Krejcar,et al.  Quality of Life Framework for Personalised Ageing: A Systematic Review of ICT Solutions , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[42]  J. Ogden Social prescribing in a time of Covid‐19 and social isolation… , 2020 .

[43]  G. Fara,et al.  COVID-19 and Cities: from Urban Health strategies to the pandemic challenge. A Decalogue of Public Health opportunities , 2020, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis.

[44]  Jodyn E. Platt,et al.  An Analysis of the Learning Health System in Its First Decade in Practice: Scoping Review , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[45]  Michelle C. Kondo,et al.  Nature Prescriptions for Health: A Review of Evidence and Research Opportunities , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[46]  R. Samson,et al.  Citizen science and sustainability transitions , 2020, Research Policy.