Performance Investigation of Solar ORC Using Di ff erent Nanofluids

: A parabolic solar dish concentrator, as the heat source of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC), can be used for power generation. Di ff erent types of tubular cavity receivers with di ff erent nanofluids can be considered for use in the solar dish collector to improve its e ffi ciency. In the current research, an ORC with three di ff erent cavity receivers including hemispherical, cubical, and cylindrical are investigated using three nanofluids: Al 2 O 3 / oil, CuO / oil, and SiO 2 / oil. A numerical model is validated using experimental data. The ORC analysis is done for a constant evaporator pressure of 2.5 MPa, and condenser temperature of 38 ◦ C. Methanol is employed as the ORC’s working fluid and a non-regenerative, ideal ORC system with di ff erent turbine inlet temperatures is considered. Furthermore, a fixed solar heat transfer fluid flow rate of 60 mL / s and dish diameter of 1.9 m is investigated. Results show that, compared to pure oil, the thermal e ffi ciency of the cavity receivers increases slightly, and the pressure drop increases with the application of nanofluids. Furthermore, results show that the cubical cavity receiver, using oil / Al 2 O 3 nanofluid, is the most e ffi cient choice for application as the investigated solar ORC’s heat source. 2.5 MPa, and a condenser temperature of 38 ◦ C. Methanol was considered as the ORC working fluid. A fixed solar heat transfer fluid mass flow rate of 60 mL / s and dish diameter of 1.9 m was investigated. Results showed that the working fluid outlet temperature, and thermal e ffi ciency is the highest for the cubical cavity receiver. Also, the total irreversibility rate of the ORC, the ORC mass flow rate, and the ORC overall e ffi ciency are the highest for the cubical cavity receiver. Furthermore, it was shown that the total irreversibility rate of the three cavity receivers investigated is increased by increasing the TIT of the ORC system. Results showed that the pressure drop through the cavity receivers was increased by the application of nanofluids. For all three cavity receivers, di ff erent thermal parameters were insignificantly increased with the application of nanofluids. Further improvements are recommended based on the optimization of variables, such as the mass flow rate, fixed in this work. The application of the SiO 2 / oil nanofluid had the lowest e ff ect on improving the ORC performance. The cubical cavity receiver, using oil / Al 2 O 3 , was found to be the most e ffi cient choice for application as the investigated solar ORC’s heat source. Finally, the thermal e ffi ciency improved with about 2%–3% using the application of Al 2 O 3 / oil or CuO / oil nanofluid with higher nanofluid concentration as the solar ORC system’s working fluid.

[1]  Reyhaneh Loni,et al.  Effects of size and volume fraction of alumina nanoparticles on the performance of a solar organic Rankine cycle , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[2]  B. Ghobadian,et al.  Numerical comparison of a solar dish concentrator with different cavity receivers and working fluids , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  E. A. Asli-Ardeh,et al.  GMDH modeling and experimental investigation of thermal performance enhancement of hemispherical cavity receiver using MWCNT/oil nanofluid , 2018, Solar Energy.

[4]  B. Ghobadian,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on dish concentrator with cubical and cylindrical cavity receivers using thermal oil , 2018, Energy.

[5]  E. A. Asli-Ardeh,et al.  Experimental study of carbon nano tube/oil nanofluid in dish concentrator using a cylindrical cavity receiver: Outdoor tests , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[6]  Reyhaneh Loni,et al.  Thermal and exergy performance of a nanofluid-based solar dish collector with spiral cavity receiver , 2018 .

[7]  G. Kuznetsov,et al.  Extinguishing a Ground Forest Fire by Spraying Water Over its Edge , 2018, Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics.

[8]  E. Bellos,et al.  Exergetic investigation of a solar dish collector with smooth and corrugated spiral absorber operating with various nanofluids , 2018 .

[9]  A. Kasaeian,et al.  Numerical investigation of the nanofluid effects on the heat extraction process of solar ponds in the transient step , 2017 .

[10]  B. Ghobadian,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of wind effect on a hemispherical cavity receiver , 2017 .

[11]  E. Bellos,et al.  Thermal analysis of parabolic trough collector operating with mono and hybrid nanofluids , 2017 .

[12]  Umberto Desideri,et al.  Dynamic modeling of a solar ORC with compound parabolic collectors: Annual production and comparison with steady-state simulation , 2017 .

[13]  E. A. Asli-Ardeh,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a solar dish receiver using different nanofluids , 2017 .

[14]  Yanping Zhang,et al.  Cascade system using both trough system and dish system for power generation , 2017 .

[15]  Zhengkai Tu,et al.  Energy analysis of a hybrid PEMFC–solar energy residential micro-CCHP system combined with an organic Rankine cycle and vapor compression cycle , 2017 .

[16]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Exergy analysis of a solar organic Rankine cycle with square prismatic cavity receiver , 2017 .

[17]  Reyhaneh Loni,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of an organic rankine cycle using a tubular solar cavity receiver , 2016 .

[18]  S. Shaaban,et al.  Analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle with steam and organic Rankine cycles as bottoming cycles , 2016 .

[19]  Reyhaneh Loni,et al.  Optimizing the efficiency of a solar receiver with tubular cylindrical cavity for a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle , 2016 .

[20]  Ahmed M. Daabo,et al.  University of Birmingham The optical efficiency of three different geometries of a small scale cavity receiver for concentrated solar applications , 2016 .

[21]  Reyhaneh Loni,et al.  Performance study of a solar-assisted organic Rankine cycle using a dish-mounted rectangular-cavity tubular solar receiver , 2016 .

[22]  A. Kasaeian,et al.  A review on the applications of nanofluids in solar energy systems , 2015 .

[23]  Amir Rahimi,et al.  First and second thermodynamic law analyses applied to a solar dish collector , 2014 .

[24]  O. Mahian,et al.  Performance analysis of a minichannel-based solar collector using different nanofluids , 2014 .

[25]  Ahmad Banakar,et al.  Experimental performance evaluation of a stand-alone point-focus parabolic solar still , 2014 .

[26]  Josua P. Meyer,et al.  The efficiency of an open-cavity tubular solar receiver for a small-scale solar thermal Brayton cycle , 2014 .

[27]  Qianjun Mao,et al.  Study on radiation flux of the receiver with a parabolic solar concentrator system , 2014 .

[28]  A. Kasaeian Convection Heat Transfer Modeling of Ag Nanofluid Using Different Viscosity Theories , 2012 .

[29]  K. Khanafer,et al.  A critical synthesis of thermophysical characteristics of nanofluids , 2011 .

[30]  Yiding Cao,et al.  Convection heat loss from cavity receiver in parabolic dish solar thermal power system: A review , 2010 .

[31]  S. Wongwises,et al.  An experimental study on the heat transfer performance and pressure drop of TiO2-water nanofluids flowing under a turbulent flow regime , 2010 .

[32]  Sendhil Kumar Natarajan,et al.  Combined laminar natural convection and surface radiation heat transfer in a modified cavity receiver of solar parabolic dish , 2008 .

[33]  Sendhil Kumar Natarajan,et al.  Numerical investigation of natural convection heat loss in modified cavity receiver for fuzzy focal solar dish concentrator , 2007 .

[34]  Wenhua Yu,et al.  The Role of Interfacial Layers in the Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids: A Renovated Maxwell Model , 2003 .

[35]  N. D. Kaushika,et al.  Performance of a low cost solar paraboloidal dish steam generating system , 2000 .

[36]  Clare Breidenich,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1998, American Journal of International Law.

[37]  J. Eastman,et al.  Enhanced thermal conductivity through the development of nanofluids , 1996 .

[38]  G. Batchelor The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[39]  J. K. Nayak,et al.  Investigation on Convective Heat Losses from Solar Cavities under Wind Conditions , 2014 .

[40]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[41]  Terry G. Lenz,et al.  Thermal performance of solar concentrator/cavity receiver systems , 1985 .