Effect of clinical experience of chest tomosynthesis on detection of pulmonary nodules

Background: The new technique chest tomosynthesis refers to the principle of collecting low-dose projections of the chest at different angles and using these projections to reconstruct section images of the chest at a radiation dose comparable to that of chest radiography. Purpose: To investigate if, for experienced thoracic radiologists, the detectability of pulmonary nodules obtained after only a short initial learning period of chest tomosynthesis improves with additional clinical experience of the new technique. Material and Methods: Two readings of the same clinical chest tomosynthesis cases, the first performed after 6 months of clinical experience and the second after an additional period of 1 year, were conducted. Three senior thoracic radiologists, with more than 20 years of experience of chest radiography, acted as observers, with the task of detecting pulmonary nodules in a jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC1) study. The image material consisted of 42 patients with and 47 patients without pulmonary nodules examined with chest tomosynthesis. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as a reference. The total number of nodules was 131. The JAFROC1 figure of merit (FOM) was used as the principal measure of detectability. Results: The difference in the observer-averaged JAFROC1 FOM of the two readings was 0.004 (95% confidence interval: -0.11, 0.12; F-statistic: 0.01 on 1 and 2.65 df; P=0.91). Thus, no significant improvement in detectability was found after the additional clinical experience of tomosynthesis. Conclusion: The study indicates that experienced thoracic radiologists already within the first months of clinical use of chest tomosynthesis are able to take advantage of the new technique in the task of detecting pulmonary nodules.

[1]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Investigation of the dosimetry of chest tomosynthesis , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. , 2005, Radiology.

[3]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice spiral CT: comparison with axial 1-mm and 5-mm slices , 2006, European Radiology.

[4]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Evaluation of chest tomosynthesis for the detection of pulmonary nodules: effect of clinical experience and comparison with chest radiography , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[7]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[8]  A. Flinck,et al.  Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. , 2008, Radiology.

[9]  B. G. Ziedses des Plantes,et al.  Eine Neue Methode Zur Differenzierung in der Rontgenographie (Planigraphies) , 1932 .

[10]  David Gur,et al.  A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  Darrin C. Edwards,et al.  Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  E. Samei,et al.  Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC). , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  Magnus Båth,et al.  ViewDEX 2.0: a Java-based DICOM-compatible software for observer performance studies , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[15]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Pulmonary Nodules: Sensitivity of Maximum Intensity Projection versus That of Volume Rendering of 3D Multidetector CT Data , 2008 .

[16]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement From the Fleischner Society , 2006 .

[17]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness , 2003, European Radiology.

[18]  M. Ruschin,et al.  A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[19]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[20]  M. Tapiovaara,et al.  PCXMC. A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations , 1997 .

[21]  Magnus Båth,et al.  ViewDEX: A java-based software for presentation and evaluation of medical images in observer performance studies , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. , 2008, Academic radiology.