Model testing, model fitting, and social decision schemes☆

[1]  P. Schönemann.  Alternative decision schemes for six-person mock juries☆ , 1979 .

[2]  David R. Nerenz,et al.  Role Playing and the Study of Jury Behavior , 1979 .

[3]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries. , 1977 .

[4]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. , 1976 .

[5]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[6]  N. Kerr,et al.  Social decision schemes of the same four-person groups on two different intellective tasks. , 1976 .

[7]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. , 1975 .

[8]  Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.  Group size, member ability, and social decision schemes on an intellective task. , 1975 .

[9]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Group position as a function of member attitudes. Choice shift effects from the perspective of social decision scheme theory. , 1975 .

[10]  R. Bray.  Decision Rules, Attitude Similarity, and Jury Decision-Making , 1974 .

[11]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social decision schemes under risk. , 1974 .

[12]  F. Restle,et al.  The road to agreement: Subgroup pressures in small group consensus processes. , 1974 .

[13]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[14]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Comments on the articles of Hodges and of Schonemann, Cafferty, and Rotton. , 1973 .

[15]  Charles D. Johnson,et al.  An equiprobability model of risk-taking , 1972 .

[16]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Group Decision Schemes and Strategy Preferences in a Sequential Response Task. , 1970 .

[17]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .