Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes

This research explores the extent to which differences in perceived diagnosticity as compared with differences in the accessibility of associations embedded in persuasion appeals better account for the attitudinal differences found in the culture and persuasion literature. Experiment 1 replicates basic findings showing that high culture-distinct associations lead to more favorable attitudes for individuals in the target culture relative to a nontarget culture, while low culture-distinct associations lead to more attitudinal similarities across cultural boundaries. Experiments 2 and 3 explore two potential explanations for these effects. Convergent evidence, provided through within-culture and across-culture mediation analysis, is more supportive of the differential accessibility explanation. That is, high culture-distinct associations may be valued in the nontarget culture but are relatively inaccessible in memory at an individual level. The results of these experiments help to reconcile conflicting findings in the consumer psychology literature, shed insight on why cultural differences might occur, and add to the growing body of research that identifies conditions under which cultural similarities in persuasion processes and effects may be found. Copyright 2000 by the University of Chicago.

[1]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attention in Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute Importance , 1986 .

[2]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. , 2000 .

[3]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[4]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Cultural Differences and Advertising Expression: A Comparative Content Analysis of Japanese and U.S. Magazine Advertising , 1987 .

[5]  H. Triandis.  Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Personality , 1997 .

[6]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[7]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The cultural matrix of social psychology , 1998 .

[8]  Virgilio G. Enriquez.  Towards cross-cultural knowledge through cross-indigenous methods and perspectives. , 1979 .

[9]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[10]  E. J. Bourne,et al.  Does the Concept of the Person Vary Cross-Culturally? , 1982 .

[11]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. , 1999 .

[12]  F. T. Marquez.  The Relationship of Advertising and Culture in the Philippines , 1975 .

[13]  Chin Tiong Tan,et al.  The impact of cultural patterns on cognition and intention in Singapore. , 1987 .

[14]  J. G. Miller.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[16]  Grant Mccracken.  Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods , 1986 .

[17]  Rita Mårtenson,et al.  Advertising Strategies and Information Content in American and Swedish Advertising: A Comparative Content Analysis in Cross-Cultural Copy Research , 1987 .

[18]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[19]  T. Menon,et al.  Motivated cultural cognition: the impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. , 1990 .

[21]  P. Burke,et al.  Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the big five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. , 1991 .

[23]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[24]  Cheng-Huan Wu,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[25]  F. Hsu.  Rugged individualism reconsidered , 1983 .

[26]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[27]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[28]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[29]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Barbara Mueller,et al.  Reflections of Culture: An Analysis of Japanese and American Advertising Appeals. , 1986 .

[31]  R. Belk,et al.  Images of Ourselves: The Good Life in Twentieth Century Advertising , 1985 .

[32]  L. Chiu.  A CROSS‐CULTURAL COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE STYLES IN CHINESE AND AMERICAN CHILDREN , 1972 .

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[35]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Trying to Consume , 1990 .

[36]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. , 1994 .

[37]  Peter Wright.  Message-Evoked Thoughts: Persuasion Research Using Thought Verbalizations , 1980 .

[38]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[39]  John F. Sherry,et al.  "May Your Life Be Marvelous:" English Language Labelling and the Semiotics of Japanese Promotion , 1987 .