Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study

Abstract Objectives To describe the context for implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT) in England, actual and perceived barriers, and opportunities to facilitate implementation. Design Case studies and in depth interviews, with themes identified using a framework developed from grounded theory. Setting Four acute NHS trusts in England. Participants Senior trust managers and clinicians, including chief executives, directors of information technology, medical directors, and directors of nursing. Results The trusts varied in their circumstances, which may affect their ability to implement the NPfIT. The process of implementation has been suboptimal, leading to reports of low morale by the NHS staff responsible for implementation. The overall timetable is unrealistic, and trusts are uncertain about their implementation schedules. Short term benefits alone are unlikely to persuade NHS staff to adopt the national programme enthusiastically, and some may experience a loss of electronic functionality in the short term. Conclusions: The sociocultural challenges to implementing the NPfIT are as daunting as the technical and logistical ones. Senior NHS staff feel these have been neglected. We recommend that national programme managers prioritise strategies to improve communication with, and to gain the cooperation of, front line staff.

[1]  M. Cross IT gurus attempt to win doctors' hearts and minds , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: A Consensus Statement on Considerations for a Successful CPOE Implementation , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  S. Timmons,et al.  Resistance to Computerized Care Planning Systems by Qualified Nurses Working in the UK NHS , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[4]  Richard H. Dykstra,et al.  Computerized physician order entry and communication: reciprocal impacts , 2003, AMIA.

[5]  C. Normand,et al.  Process and impact of mergers of NHS trusts: multicentre case study and management cost analysis , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Denis J. Protti,et al.  A proposal to use a balanced scorecard to evaluate Information for Health: an information strategy for the modern NHS (1998-2005) , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[7]  D. Wanless Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View. The Health Service in 2022 , 2002 .

[8]  Marc Berg,et al.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  P. Darbyshire The practice politics of computerised information systems: a focus group study , 2001 .

[10]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  A diffusion of innovations model of physician order entry , 2001, AMIA.

[11]  P W Moorman,et al.  An inventory of publications on electronic patient records. , 1999, Methods of information in medicine.

[12]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Evaluating computerized health information systems: hardware, software and human ware: experiences from the Northern Province, South Africa. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[13]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  R. Hanka,et al.  Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges , 1998, BMJ.

[15]  Marilynne Hebert Professional and Organizational Impact of Using Patient Care Information Systems , 1998, MedInfo.

[16]  A. Sellen,et al.  Toward the paperless hospital? , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  John M. Longshore The Management of Strategic Change , 1990 .

[18]  M. Miles Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[19]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .