Enacting Project-Based Science

Recommendations for reform in science education place a premium on students' understanding of scientific concepts and their ability to identify problems, conduct inquiry, and use information flexibly. They call for an appreciation for how ideas evolve and are validated. In this article we discuss changes in ideas about learning that underpin the reforms. We then describe our experiences with project-based science, a pedagogy that addresses the reform recommendations. Project-based science focuses on student-designed inquiry that is organized by investigations to answer driving questions, includes collaboration among learners and others, the use of new technology, and the creation of authentic artifacts that represent student understanding. Finally, we illustrate the challenges this type of innovation poses for teachers' classroom practice, for professional development, and for policy.

[1]  G. Ramsey,et al.  The Professional Development of Science Teachers. , 1976 .

[2]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Science teaching and the development of reasoning , 1977 .

[3]  Ted Bredderman,et al.  Effects of Activity-based Elementary Science on Student Outcomes: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1983 .

[4]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[5]  T. Guskey.  Staff Development and Teacher Change. , 1985 .

[6]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Instruction on College Nonmajors' Conceptions of Respiration and Photosynthesis. Research Series No. 164. , 1990 .

[7]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[8]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[9]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. SUNY Series in Educational Leadership. , 1987 .

[10]  C. M. Clark,et al.  Asking the Right Questions About Teacher Preparation: Contributions of Research on Teacher Thinking , 1988 .

[11]  B. Joyce,et al.  Student Achievement Through Staff Development , 1988 .

[12]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[13]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[14]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Significant and Worthwhile Change in Teaching Practice , 1990 .

[15]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[16]  D. Perkins.  Smart Schools: From Training Memories to Educating Minds , 1992 .

[17]  Richard S. Prawat,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: A Constructivist Perspective , 1992, American Journal of Education.

[18]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[19]  Beverly Hunter.  Linking for learning: Computer-and-communications network support for nationwide innovation in education , 1992 .

[20]  M. Fullan.  Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[21]  Richard Ruopp,et al.  LabNet: Toward a community of practice , 1993 .

[22]  A. Dodd.  The Case for Change: Rethinking the Preparation of Educators , 1993 .

[23]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[24]  Carolyn A. Scott.  Project-Based Science: Reflections of a Middle School Teacher , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[25]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[26]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Middle Grade Science Teacher's Emerging Understanding of Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[27]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Becoming Reflective Students and Teachers with Portfolios and Authentic Assessment. Psychology in the Classroom: A Series on Applied Educational Psychology. , 1994 .

[28]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The climate visualizer: Sense-making through scientific visualization , 1994 .

[29]  Merrie L. Blunk,et al.  Enacting Project-Based Science: Experiences of Four Middle Grade Teachers , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[30]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century , 1994, INTR.

[31]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[32]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Cognitive strategies in dynamic modeling: case studies of opportunities taken and missed , 1996 .

[33]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The Development of Middle School Students Inquiry Strategies in Project Based-Science Classrooms , 1996, ICLS.

[34]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The Casebook of Project Practices--an Example of an Interactive Multimedia System for Professional Development. , 1996 .

[35]  Barbara Ann Crawford.  Examining the essential elements of a community of learners in a middle grade science classroom. , 1996 .

[36]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  International handbook of teachers and teaching , 1997 .

[37]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Teacher Learning: Implications of New Views of Cognition , 1997 .

[38]  Kristina Woolsey,et al.  Science Education and Technology: Opportunities to Enhance Student Learning , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[39]  Eva Hornecker artec,et al.  Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education ( AACE ) . Distributed via the Web by permission of AACE Coupling Physical Artifacts , 2022 .