Structural assessment using terrestrial laser scanning point clouds

PurposeTerrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point clouds have been widely used in deformation measurement for structures. However, reliability and accuracy of resulting deformation estimation strongly depends on quality of each step of a workflow, which are not fully addressed. This study aims to give insight error of these steps, and results of the study would be guidelines for a practical community to either develop a new workflow or refine an existing one of deformation estimation based on TLS point clouds. Thus, the main contributions of the paper are investigating point cloud registration error affecting resulting deformation estimation, identifying an appropriate segmentation method used to extract data points of a deformed surface, investigating a methodology to determine an un-deformed or a reference surface for estimating deformation, and proposing a methodology to minimize the impact of outlier, noisy data and/or mixed pixels on deformation estimation.Design/methodology/approachIn practice, the quality of data point clouds and of surface extraction strongly impacts on resulting deformation estimation based on laser scanning point clouds, which can cause an incorrect decision on the state of the structure if uncertainty is available. In an effort to have more comprehensive insight into those impacts, this study addresses four issues: data errors due to data registration from multiple scanning stations (Issue 1), methods used to extract point clouds of structure surfaces (Issue 2), selection of the reference surface Sref to measure deformation (Issue 3), and available outlier and/or mixed pixels (Issue 4). This investigation demonstrates through estimating deformation of the bridge abutment, building and an oil storage tank.FindingsThe study shows that both random sample consensus (RANSAC) and region growing–based methods [a cell-based/voxel-based region growing (CRG/VRG)] can be extracted data points of surfaces, but RANSAC is only applicable for a primary primitive surface (e.g. a plane in this study) subjected to a small deformation (case study 2 and 3) and cannot eliminate mixed pixels. On another hand, CRG and VRG impose a suitable method applied for deformed, free-form surfaces. In addition, in practice, a reference surface of a structure is mostly not available. The use of a fitting plane based on a point cloud of a current surface would cause unrealistic and inaccurate deformation because outlier data points and data points of damaged areas affect an accuracy of the fitting plane. This study would recommend the use of a reference surface determined based on a design concept/specification. A smoothing method with a spatial interval can be effectively minimize, negative impact of outlier, noisy data and/or mixed pixels on deformation estimation.Research limitations/implicationsDue to difficulty in logistics, an independent measurement cannot be established to assess the deformation accuracy based on TLS data point cloud in the case studies of this research. However, common laser scanners using the time-of-flight or phase-shift principle provide point clouds with accuracy in the order of 1–6 mm, while the point clouds of triangulation scanners have sub-millimetre accuracy.Practical implicationsThis study aims to give insight error of these steps, and the results of the study would be guidelines for a practical community to either develop a new workflow or refine an existing one of deformation estimation based on TLS point clouds.Social implicationsThe results of this study would provide guidelines for a practical community to either develop a new workflow or refine an existing one of deformation estimation based on TLS point clouds. A low-cost method can be applied for deformation analysis of the structure.Originality/valueAlthough a large amount of the studies used laser scanning to measure structure deformation in the last two decades, the methods mainly applied were to measure change between two states (or epochs) of the structure surface and focused on quantifying deformation-based TLS point clouds. Those studies proved that a laser scanner could be an alternative unit to acquire spatial information for deformation monitoring. However, there are still challenges in establishing an appropriate procedure to collect a high quality of point clouds and develop methods to interpret the point clouds to obtain reliable and accurate deformation, when uncertainty, including data quality and reference information, is available. Therefore, this study demonstrates the impact of data quality in a term of point cloud registration error, selected methods for extracting point clouds of surfaces, identifying reference information, and available outlier, noisy data and/or mixed pixels on deformation estimation.

[1]  Pengkun Liu,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning assisted flatness quality assessment for two different types of concrete surfaces , 2020 .

[2]  C. Harmening,et al.  A spatio-temporal deformation model for laser scanning point clouds , 2020, Journal of Geodesy.

[3]  Michela Bertolotto,et al.  Octree-based region growing for point cloud segmentation , 2015 .

[4]  Anu Pradhan,et al.  Evacuation Route Selection Based on Tree-Based Hazards Using Light Detection and Ranging and GIS , 2006 .

[5]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Application of terrestrial laser scanner in bridge inspection: Review and an opportunity , 2014 .

[6]  T. Rabbani,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF POINT CLOUDS USING SMOOTHNESS CONSTRAINT , 2006 .

[7]  L. Truong-Hong,et al.  Measuring deformation of bridge structures using laser scanning data , 2019 .

[8]  Wanqiu Liu,et al.  Lidar-Based bridge structure defect detection , 2011 .

[9]  Frédéric Bosché,et al.  Automated recognition of 3D CAD model objects in laser scans and calculation of as-built dimensions for dimensional compliance control in construction , 2010, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[10]  C. Hancock,et al.  A review of the use of terrestrial laser scanning application for change detection and deformation monitoring of structures , 2016 .

[11]  Antonio Galgaro,et al.  Contactless recognition of concrete surface damage from laser scanning and curvature computation , 2009 .

[12]  Linh Truong-Hong,et al.  Automatic detection of road edges from aerial laser scanning data , 2019 .

[13]  M. Menenti,et al.  Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2011 .

[14]  D. Lichti,et al.  Angular resolution of terrestrial laser scanners , 2006 .

[15]  Roderik Lindenbergh,et al.  Change detection and deformation analysis using static and mobile laser scanning , 2015 .

[16]  Higinio González-Jorge,et al.  Validation of terrestrial laser scanning and photogrammetry techniques for the measurement of vertical underclearance and beam geometry in structural inspection of bridges , 2013 .

[17]  David Coyne,et al.  Lateral Image Degradation in Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2009 .

[18]  Xiao Xiang Zhu,et al.  A Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation , 2019, ArXiv.

[19]  Roderik Lindenbergh,et al.  Inspecting structural components of a construction project using laser scanning , 2020 .

[20]  Ruijie Xi,et al.  Bridge monitoring using multi-GNSS observations with high cutoff elevations: A case study , 2021 .

[21]  Qian Wang,et al.  Development of a mixed pixel filter for improved dimension estimation using AMCW laser scanner , 2016 .

[22]  Aleksey Boyko,et al.  Extracting roads from dense point clouds in large scale urban environment , 2011 .

[23]  Hyojoo Son,et al.  3D structural component recognition and modeling method using color and 3D data for construction progress monitoring , 2010 .

[24]  Linh Truong-Hong,et al.  Documentation of bridges by terrestrial laser scanner , 2015 .

[25]  B. Riveiro,et al.  A case study of measurements of deformations due to different loads in pieces less than 1 m from lidar data , 2020 .

[26]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning intensity data applied to damage detection for historical buildings , 2010 .

[27]  M. Kavvadas,et al.  Monitoring ground deformation in tunnelling: Current practice in transportation tunnels , 2005 .

[28]  Jacek Katzer,et al.  Remote Detection of Moisture and Bio-Deterioration of Building Walls by Time-Of-Flight and Phase-Shift Terrestrial Laser Scanners , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Frédéric Bosché,et al.  Automating surface flatness control using terrestrial laser scanning and building information models , 2014 .

[30]  Kai Tan,et al.  Correction of Mobile TLS Intensity Data for Water Leakage Spots Detection in Metro Tunnels , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[31]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF A BORED TUNNEL BY MEANS OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2006 .

[32]  Debra F. Laefer Harnessing Remote Sensing for Civil Engineering: Then, Now, and Tomorrow , 2020 .

[33]  Bhakapong Bhadrakom,et al.  AS-BUILT 3D MODELING BASED ON STRUCTURE FROM MOTION FOR DEFORMATION ASSESSMENT OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS , 2016 .

[34]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Crack detection limits in unit based masonry with terrestrial laser scanning , 2014 .

[35]  Hyo Seon Park,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning-based stress estimation model using multi-dimensional double layer lattices , 2017, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[36]  Hao Xu,et al.  Registration of Laser Scanning Point Clouds: A Review , 2018, Sensors.

[37]  Daniele Perissin,et al.  Evaluation of InSAR monitoring data for post‐tunnelling settlement damage assessment , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[38]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Efficient RANSAC for Point‐Cloud Shape Detection , 2007, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[39]  G. Milani,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of rubble masonry structures from dense point clouds , 2020 .

[40]  Linh Truong-Hong,et al.  Quantitative evaluation strategies for urban 3D model generation from remote sensing data , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[41]  Yasuhiro Koda,et al.  Quantitative scaling evaluation of concrete structures based on terrestrial laser scanning , 2013 .

[42]  Cemal Ozer Yigit,et al.  Displacement response of a concrete arch dam to seasonal temperature fluctuations and reservoir level rise during the first filling period: evidence from geodetic data , 2016 .

[43]  Arianna Pesci,et al.  A laser scanning-based method for fast estimation of seismic-induced building deformations , 2013 .

[44]  Nico Blodow,et al.  Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[45]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Combining an Angle Criterion with Voxelization and the Flying Voxel Method in Reconstructing Building Models from LiDAR Data , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[46]  Naif Haddad,et al.  From ground surveying to 3D laser scanner: A review of techniques used for spatial documentation of historic sites , 2011 .

[47]  M. Sedek,et al.  Development of new system for detection of bridges construction defects using terrestrial laser remote sensing technology , 2016 .

[48]  J. Paffenholz,et al.  High Frequency Terrestrial Laser Scans for Monitoring Kinematic Processes , 2008 .

[49]  Jean-Philippe Montillet,et al.  Critical Infrastructure Monitoring with Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2016 .

[50]  Bahman Jafari,et al.  Tracking Structural Deformations via Automated Sample-Based Point Cloud Analysis , 2017 .

[51]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Algorithm for automatic detection and analysis of cracks in timber beams from LiDAR data , 2017 .

[52]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Characterization of Laser Scanners and Algorithms for Detecting Flatness Defects on Concrete Surfaces , 2011, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[53]  Pedro Arias-Sánchez,et al.  Assessment of cracks on concrete bridges using image processing supported by laser scanning survey , 2017 .

[54]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning-Based Structural Damage Assessment , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[55]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Toward automatic generation of 3D steel structures for building information modelling , 2017 .

[56]  Wioleta Błaszczak-Bąk,et al.  Down-Sampling of Point Clouds for the Technical Diagnostics of Buildings and Structures , 2019, Geosciences.

[57]  D. Lague,et al.  Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) , 2013, 1302.1183.

[58]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Error Models and Propagation in Directly Georeferenced Terrestrial Laser Scanner Networks , 2005 .

[59]  H. Zheng,et al.  Reconstitution method for tunnel spatiotemporal deformation based on 3D laser scanning technology and corresponding instability warning , 2021, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[60]  D. Girardeau-Montaut,et al.  CHANGE DETECTION ON POINTS CLOUD DATA ACQUIRED W ITH A GROUND LASER SCANNER , 2005 .

[61]  P.V.C. Hough,et al.  Machine Analysis of Bubble Chamber Pictures , 1959 .