Mean-variance asset-liability management: Cointegrated assets and insurance liability

The cointegration of major financial markets around the globe is well evidenced with strong empirical support. This paper considers the continuous-time mean–variance (MV) asset–liability management (ALM) problem for an insurer investing in an incomplete financial market with cointegrated assets. The number of trading assets is allowed to be less than the number of Brownian motions spanning the market. The insurer also faces the risk of paying uncertain insurance claims during the investment period. We assume that the cointegration market follows the diffusion limit of the error-correction model for cointegrated time series. Using the Markowitz (1952) MV portfolio criterion, we consider the insurer’s problem of minimizing variance in the terminal wealth, given an expected terminal wealth subject to interim random liability payments following a compound Poisson process. We generalize the technique developed by Lim (2005) to tackle this problem. The particular structure of cointegration enables us to solve the ALM problem completely in the sense that the solutions of the continuous-time portfolio policy and efficient frontier are obtained as explicit and closed-form formulas.

[1]  Duan Li,et al.  Asset-Liability Management Under the Safety-First Principle , 2009 .

[2]  C. Alexander,et al.  Optimal hedging using cointegration , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Arthur Havenner,et al.  Cointegration and stock prices: The random walk on wall street revisited , 1988 .

[4]  R. Baillie,et al.  Common Stochastic Trends in a System of Exchange Rates , 1989 .

[5]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[6]  Jin-Chuan Duan,et al.  Option valuation with co-integrated asset prices , 2000 .

[7]  Teppo Martikainen,et al.  Common volatility in major stock index futures markets , 1996 .

[8]  C. Granger Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification , 1981 .

[9]  Mark P. Taylor,et al.  The Internationalisation of Stock Markets and the Abolition of U.K. Exchange Control , 1989 .

[10]  Apostolos Serletis,et al.  A cointegration analysis of petroleum futures prices , 1994 .

[11]  Athanasios L. Athanasenas Credit, income, and causality: A contemporary co-integration analysis , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Andrew E. B. Lim Mean-Variance Hedging When There Are Jumps , 2005, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[13]  Philippe Jorion,et al.  Mean reversion in real exchange rates: evidence and implications for forecasting , 1996 .

[14]  H. Abou-Kandil,et al.  Matrix Riccati Equations in Control and Systems Theory , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Vladimir E. Bening,et al.  Generalized Poisson Models and their Applications in Insurance and Finance , 2002 .

[16]  Andrew E. B. Lim Quadratic Hedging and Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Random Parameters in an Incomplete Market , 2004, Math. Oper. Res..

[17]  J. Wang,et al.  Continuous time mean variance asset allocation: A time-consistent strategy , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Mean Reversion in G-10 Nominal Exchange Rates , 2006 .

[19]  Duan Li,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Portfolio Selection: Multiperiod Mean‐Variance Formulation , 2000 .

[20]  Andrew E. B. Lim,et al.  Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Random Parameters in a Complete Market , 2002, Math. Oper. Res..

[21]  A. M. Mathai Quadratic forms in random variables , 1992 .

[22]  Duan Li,et al.  Asset and liability management under a continuous-time mean–variance optimization framework , 2006 .

[23]  Hoi Ying Wong,et al.  Mean-variance portfolio selection of cointegrated assets , 2011 .

[24]  X. Zhou,et al.  Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection: A Stochastic LQ Framework , 2000 .

[25]  C. Hipp,et al.  Optimal investment for insurers , 2000 .