Formal specification and dependability analysis of optical communication networks

Network dependability reflects the ability to deliver continuous services even after failures, such as man-made or natural disturbances, e.g., storms, hurricanes, and floods, etc. In the last decade, optical networks have been increasingly deployed to provide multicast traffic in metropolitan areas. In this paper, we provide a formal specification of double-rings with dual attachments (DRDA) topologies of optical networks using Continuous-Time Markov Chains. Our formal modeling includes the concept of pre-configured protection cycles (p-cycles), which provide effective fault tolerance against link-failures in optical networks. Our approach is generic enough to handle networks of any size that are prone to any combinations of link failures. We formally specify several dependability properties using Continuous Stochastic Logic (CSL). We then provide a quantitative evaluation of these properties using the PRISM model checker. We observe that such formal analysis can provide critical information at early design stages to network operators for designing highly-dependable optical networks in metropolitan areas (e.g., availability on the order of 99.99% or 99.999%).

[1]  P. Cholda,et al.  Reliability Assessment of Optical p-Cycles , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  Umair Siddique,et al.  Formal Stability Analysis of Optical Resonators , 2013, NASA Formal Methods.

[3]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Aviation safety: modeling and analyzing complex interactions between humans and automated systems , 2013, ATACCS.

[4]  Yvon Savaria,et al.  Towards an accurate reliability, availability and maintainability analysis approach for satellite systems based on probabilistic model checking , 2015, 2015 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[5]  Christel Baier,et al.  Principles of model checking , 2008 .

[6]  Christel Baier,et al.  Principles of Model Checking (Representation and Mind Series) , 2008 .

[7]  Wayne D. Grover,et al.  Cycle-oriented distributed preconfiguration: ring-like speed with mesh-like capacity for self-planning network restoration , 1998, ICC '98. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Affiliated with SUPERCOMM'98 (Cat. No.98CH36220).

[8]  Umair Siddique,et al.  Towards the formal analysis of microresonators based photonic systems , 2014, 2014 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[9]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective , 1998 .

[10]  Yvon Savaria,et al.  Probabilistic model checking based DAL analysis to optimize a combined TMR-blind-scrubbing mitigation technique for FPGA-based aerospace applications , 2014, 2014 Twelfth ACM/IEEE Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Codesign (MEMOCODE).

[11]  Marta Z. Kwiatkowska,et al.  PRISM 4.0: Verification of Probabilistic Real-Time Systems , 2011, CAV.

[12]  Christel Baier,et al.  Approximate Symbolic Model Checking of Continuous-Time Markov Chains , 1999, CONCUR.

[13]  Marie Duflot,et al.  Practical Applications of Probabilistic Model Checking to Communication Protocols , 2012 .

[14]  Sebastian Junges,et al.  Model-Checking Assisted Protocol Design for Ultra-reliable Low-Latency Wireless Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 35th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS).

[15]  Bengt Jonsson,et al.  A logic for reasoning about time and reliability , 1990, Formal Aspects of Computing.

[16]  Juan P. Fernández Palacios,et al.  A reliability analysis of Double-Ring topologies with Dual Attachment using p-cycles for optical metro networks , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[17]  Ting Wang,et al.  32Tb/s (320×114Gb/s) PDM-RZ-8QAM transmission over 580km of SMF-28 ultra-low-loss fiber , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[18]  Suresh Subramaniam,et al.  On double-link failure recovery in WDM optical networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[19]  Robert I. Miller,et al.  Hurricane Katrina: Communications & Infrastructure Impacts , 2006 .