A preliminary look at duplicate testing associated with lack of electronic health record interoperability for transferred patients

Duplication of medical testing results in a financial burden to the healthcare system. Authors undertook a retrospective review of duplicate testing on patients receiving coordinated care across two institutions, each with its own electronic medical record system. In order to determine whether duplicate testing occurred and if such testing was clinically indicated, authors analyzed records of 85 patients transferred from one site to the other between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007. Duplication of testing (repeat within 12 hours) was found in 32% of the cases examined; 20% of cases had at least one duplicate test not clinically indicated. While previous studies document that inaccessibility of paper records leads to duplicate testing when patients are transferred between care facilities, the current study suggests that incomplete electronic record transfer among incompatible electronic medical record systems can also lead to potentially costly duplicate testing behaviors. The authors believe that interoperable systems with integrated decision support could assist in minimizing duplication of testing at time of patient transfers.

[1]  John D Halamka.  Making smart investments in health information technology: core principles. , 2009, Health affairs.

[2]  S H Thomas,et al.  Frequency and costs of laboratory and radiograph repetition in trauma patients undergoing interfacility transfer. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  C. McDonald,et al.  Computerized display of past test results. Effect on outpatient testing. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[4]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. , 2005, Health affairs.

[5]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Research Paper: Controlled Trial of Direct Physician Order Entry: Effects on Physicians' Time Utilization in Ambulatory Primary Care Internal Medicine Practices , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange , 2007, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  E. Andrew Balas,et al.  Interoperable Electronic Patient Records for Health Care Improvement , 2009, MIE.

[9]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  T. A. May,et al.  Reducing unnecessary inpatient laboratory testing in a teaching hospital. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[12]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Extrapolating evidence of health information technology savings and costs , 2005 .

[13]  Mark House,et al.  Snowbirds, sunbirds, and stayers: seasonal migration of elderly adults in Florida. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[14]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[15]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  U.S. Regional health information organizations: progress and challenges. , 2009, Health affairs.