Modularity and hierarchical organization of action programs in human acquisition of graphic skills

If motor or action programs become modules with practice their defining features (e.g. relative timing) should remain relatively invariant in new tasks. To test this hypothesis 24 adults practiced a graphic skill over 100 trials and were transferred to a more complex task enclosing the practiced figure. The data acquired by a digital tablet resulted in total movement and total pause times to draw the figure indicating skill acquisition and variability measures of relative timing and pause time and sequencing referring to features that identify a module. Being transferred to a more complex task did not lead to significant increases in the time to perform the criterion figure embedded in the new pattern. Modularity was evidenced by the stability of relative timing and sequencing shown in the performance of the criterion figure. Hence, it might be that action programs become modules that are then hierarchically organized to form more complex skills.

[1]  K. Connolly,et al.  Mechanisms of Motor Skill Development , 1971 .

[2]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Invariant relative timing in motor-program theory , 1991 .

[3]  H. Heuer,et al.  Generation and modulation of action patterns , 1986 .

[4]  R. Hinde.  Constraints on learning , 1973 .

[5]  Paolo Viviani,et al.  Do Units of Motor Action Really Exist , 1986 .

[6]  Thomas Eggert,et al.  Learning to write letters: transfer in automated movements indicates modularity of motor programs in human subjects , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[8]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in motor neuroscience , 1991 .

[9]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[10]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[11]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Neurophysiology & neuropsychology of motor development , 1997 .

[12]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[13]  P. Viviani,et al.  32 Space-Time Invariance in Learned Motor Skills , 1980 .

[14]  E de J Manoel,et al.  Variability and the development of skilled actions. , 1995, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  R. Schmidt.  8 On the Theoretical Status of Time in Motor Program Representations , 1980 .

[16]  C. A. Terzuolo,et al.  On the relation between word-specific patterns and the central control model of typing: A reply to Gentner. , 1982 .

[17]  M. Jeannerod.  The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  J. Goodnow,et al.  “The grammar of action”: Sequence and syntax in children's copying☆ , 1973 .

[19]  J. Requin.  From action representation to movement control , 1992 .

[20]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[21]  Arnold J.W.M. Thomassen,et al.  A Quantitative Model of Graphic Production , 1991 .