Multiple‐region directed functional connectivity based on phase delays

Network analysis is increasingly advancing the field of neuroimaging. Neural networks are generally constructed from pairwise interactions with an assumption of linear relations between them. Here, a high‐order statistical framework to calculate directed functional connectivity among multiple regions, using wavelet analysis and spectral coherence has been presented. The mathematical expression for 4 regions was derived and used to characterize a quartet of regions as a linear, combined (nonlinear), or disconnected network. Phase delays between regions were used to obtain network's temporal hierarchy and directionality. The validity of the mathematical derivation along with the effects of coupling strength and noise on its outcomes were studied by computer simulations of the Kuramoto model. The simulations demonstrated correct directionality for a large range of coupling strength and low sensitivity to Gaussian noise compared with pairwise coherences. The analysis was applied to resting‐state fMRI data of 40 healthy young subjects to characterize the ventral visual system, motor system and default mode network (DMN). It was shown that the ventral visual system was predominantly composed of linear networks while the motor system and the DMN were composed of combined (nonlinear) networks. The ventral visual system exhibits its known temporal hierarchy, the motor system exhibits center ↔ out hierarchy and the DMN has dorsal ↔ ventral and anterior ↔ posterior organizations. The analysis can be applied in different disciplines such as seismology, or economy and in a variety of brain data including stimulus‐driven fMRI, electrophysiology, EEG, and MEG, thus open new horizons in brain research. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1374–1386, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[3]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[4]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Correlations and anticorrelations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI: A quantitative comparison of preprocessing strategies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[6]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  C. Stam,et al.  Direction of information flow in large-scale resting-state networks is frequency-dependent , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  Gabriele Lohmann,et al.  Investigating the wavelet coherence phase of the BOLD signal , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Neil J. Balmforth,et al.  A shocking display of synchrony , 2000 .

[13]  M. Fukunaga,et al.  Negative BOLD-fMRI Signals in Large Cerebral Veins , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[14]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[15]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[16]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Go with the flow: Use of a directed phase lag index (dPLI) to characterize patterns of phase relations in a large-scale model of brain dynamics , 2012, NeuroImage.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  Dost Öngür,et al.  Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  John Clarke,et al.  dc SQUID: Noise and optimization , 1977 .

[23]  Rui Li,et al.  Bayesian network analysis revealed the connectivity difference of the default mode network from the resting-state to task-state , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[24]  P. Webster,et al.  Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system , 1999 .

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural and Functional Brain Networks: From Connections to Cognition , 2013, Science.

[26]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[27]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  Bryan C. Daniels Synchronization of Globally Coupled Nonlinear Oscillators: the Rich Behavior of the Kuramoto Model , 2005 .