The role of building technologies in reducing and controlling peak electricity demand

Peak power demand issues have come to the fore recently because of the California electricity crisis. Uncertainties surrounding the reliability of electric power systems in restructured markets as well as security worries are the latest reasons for such concerns, but the issues surrounding peak demand are as old as the electric utility system itself. The long lead times associated with building new capacity, the lack of price response in the face of time-varying costs, the large difference between peak demand and average demand, and the necessity for real-time delivery of electricity all make the connection between system peak demand and system reliability an important driver of public policy in the electric utility sector. This exploratory option paper was written at the request of Jerry Dion at the U.S.Department of Energy (DOE). It is one of several white papers commissioned in 2002 exploring key issues of relevance to DOE. This paper explores policy-relevant issues surrounding peak demand, to help guide DOE's research efforts in this area. The findings of this paper are as follows. In the short run, DOE funding of deployment activities on peak demand can help society achieve a more economically efficient balance between investments in supply and demand-side technologies. DOE policies can promote implementation of key technologies to ameliorate peak demand, through government purchasing, technology demonstrations, and improvements in test procedures, efficiency standards, and labeling programs. In the long run, R&D is probably the most important single leverage point for DOE to influence the peak demand issue. Technologies for time-varying price response hold great potential for radically altering the way people use electricity in buildings, but are decades away from widespread use, so DOE R&D and expertise can make a real difference here.

[1]  A. P. Fugill The Detroit Edison company's system , 1932, Electrical Engineering.

[2]  Marc J. Roberts,et al.  5 The Pacific Gas and Electric Company , 1981 .

[3]  THE VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY. Financial Impacts on Utilities of Load Shape Changes Project: Stage III Summary Report , 1984 .

[4]  B. E. Mills,et al.  Development of residential hot water use patterns , 1985 .

[5]  The residential hourly and peak demand model: Description and validation , 1985 .

[6]  FINANCIAL IMPACTS ON UTILITIES OF LOAD SHAPE CHANGES. THERMAL INTEGRITY MEASURES FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS: TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY AND NEVADA POWER COMPANY , 1986 .

[7]  J. McMahon,et al.  The LBL Residential Energy Model , 1986 .

[8]  Financial impacts on utilities of load shape changes: The Texas Utilities Electric Company , 1986 .

[9]  S. S. Rath,et al.  Conference proceedings , 1999, 1987 IEEE Applied Power Electronics conference and Exposition.

[10]  E. Kahn Electric utility planning and regulation , 1988 .

[11]  Joseph H. Eto,et al.  Integrated analysis of demand-side programs , 1988 .

[12]  J. H. Eto,et al.  RESIDENTIAL END-USE LOAD SHAPE DATA ANALYSIS: FINAL REPORT , 1989 .

[13]  E. E. Richman,et al.  Commercial equipment loads: End-Use Load and Consumer Assessment Program (ELCAP) , 1990 .

[14]  Arthur H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Conservation Screening Curves to Compare Efficiency Investments to Power Plants , 1990 .

[15]  D. S. Shugar,et al.  Photovoltaics in the utility distribution system: The evaluation of system and distributed benefits , 1990, IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists.

[16]  Joel N. Swisher,et al.  Targeting DSM for Transmission and Distribution Benefits , 1992 .

[17]  J. N. Swisher,et al.  Targeting DSM for transmission and distributions benefits: A case study of PG&E`s Delta District. Final report , 1992 .

[18]  Analysis of PG&E`s residential end-use metered data to improve electricity demand forecasts -- final report , 1993 .

[19]  The Cost and Performance of Utility Commercial Lighting Programs , 1994 .

[20]  Joseph H. Eto,et al.  Where did the money go? The cost and performance of the largest commercial sector DSM program , 1995 .

[21]  J. Eto,et al.  Where Did the Money Go? The Cost and Performance of the Largest Commercial Sector DSM Programs , 2000 .

[22]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Trouble With Electricity Markets and California's Electricity Restructuring Disaster , 2001 .

[23]  Marvin J. Horowitz,et al.  Economic Indicators of Market Transformation: Energy Efficient Lighting and EPA's Green Lights , 2001 .

[24]  Peter H. Larsen,et al.  Benefits of Peak Load Reduction Resulting from the Central Air-Conditioning (CAC) Standard , 2001 .

[25]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  Savings estimates for the ENERGY STAR (registered trademark) voluntary labeling program: 2001 status report , 2002 .

[26]  J. Osborn,et al.  Reliability of the U.S. electric system -- Recent trends and current issues , 2002 .

[27]  Joseph H. Eto,et al.  California Customer Load Reductions during the Electricity Crisis: Did They Help to Keep the Lights On? , 2002 .

[28]  Princeton Forrestal Village NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY COUNCIL , 2003 .

[29]  Jonathan G. Koomey,et al.  Electricity Use in California: Past Trends and Present Usage Patterns , 2003 .

[30]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Technical Support Document: Energy efficiency standards for consumer products: residential central air conditioners and heat pumps , 2004 .