Future Studies of Learning Software Organizations

We suggest to study learning software organizations in three projects; one to analyse the current situation for local software and system houses, one to study improvement and learning through examining knowledge flows, and a third to study the impact of a large-scale interaction process: Open Space Technology to share domain knowledge.

[1]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Implementing requirements engineering processes throughout organizations: success factors and challenges , 2004, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[2]  B. Randell,et al.  Software Engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch, Germany, 7-11 Oct. 1968, Brussels, Scientific Affairs Division, NATO , 1969 .

[3]  Laurie P. Dringus,et al.  Book Review of: Paradigm shift: the new promise of information technology, Tapscott D. (ed), Caston A. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1993 , 1993 .

[4]  Mohamed E. Fayad,et al.  Software Engineering in the Small , 2000 .

[5]  Michael Daskalantonakis,et al.  A Practical View of Software Measurement and Implementation Experiences Within Motorola , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[6]  Kurt Schneider.  A Descriptive Model of Software Development to Guide Process Improvement , 2004 .

[7]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  An empirical study of the effect of knowledge integration on software development performance , 2004, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[8]  Kent L. Beck,et al.  Extreme programming explained - embrace change , 1990 .

[9]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Paradigm shift: The new promise of information technology: Don Tapscott and Art Caston McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1993, 337 pp. £21.95 ISBN 0-07-062857-2 , 1992, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Torgeir Dingsøyr,et al.  Using Open Space Technology as a Method to Share Domain Knowledge , 2005, Wissensmanagement.

[11]  Mauri Laitinen,et al.  Thinking objectively: software engineering in the small , 2000, CACM.

[12]  Kurt Schneider.  Software Process Improvement from a FLOW Perspective , 2005, Wissensmanagement.

[13]  K. Beck,et al.  Extreme Programming Explained , 2002 .

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[15]  S. Anderson,et al.  Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. , 2000 .

[16]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Technology Partnerships between Larger and Smaller Firms: Some Critical Issues , 1987 .

[17]  Jyrki Kontio,et al.  Experiences in improving risk management processes using the concepts of the Riskit method , 1998, SIGSOFT '98/FSE-6.

[18]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach , 1991 .

[19]  Kari Smolander,et al.  Local Software Organizations with Global Customers: a Survival Quest , 2005, Wissensmanagement.

[20]  Kurt Schneider,et al.  LIDs: A Light-Weight Approach to Experience Elicitation and Reuse , 2000, PROFES.

[21]  Brian Randell,et al.  Software engineering : report on a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch, Germany, 7th to 11th October 1968 , 1969 .

[22]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[23]  Kurt Schneider,et al.  Prototypes as assets, not toys. Why and how to extract knowledge from prototypes. (Experience report) , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[24]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  Effective Software Project Management Education through Simulation Models: An Externally Replicated Experiment , 2004, PROFES.

[25]  Angelo Artale,et al.  A Descriptive Model , 1997 .