Comparison of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry and optical coherence tomography to discriminate ocular hypertension and glaucoma at an early stage

BackgroundThe aim was to compare the ability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to discriminate eyes with ocular hypertension (OHT), glaucoma-suspect eyes (GS) or early glaucomatous eyes (EG) from normal eyes.MethodsOcular hypertension, GS, and EG were defined as normal disc with intraocular pressure >21 mmHg, glaucomatous disc without visual field loss, and glaucomatous disc accompanying the early glaucomatous visual filed loss respectively. Ninety-three normal eyes, 26 OHT, 55 GS, and 67 EG were enrolled. Optic disc configuration was analyzed by CSLO (version 3.04), whereas retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was analyzed by SLP (GDx-VCC; version 5.3.2) and OCT-1 (version A6X1) in each individual. The measurements were compared in the four groups of patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) discriminating OHT, GS or EG from normal eyes were compared for the three instruments.ResultsMost parameters in GS and EG eyes showed significant differences compared with normal eyes. However, there were few significant differences between normal and OHT eyes. No significant differences were observed in AUCs between SLP and OCT. In EG eyes, the greatest AUC parameter in OCT (inferior—120; 0.932) had a higher AUC than that in CSLO (vertical cup/disc ratio; 0.845; P=0.017). In GS, the greatest AUC parameter in OCT (average retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] thickness; 0.869; P=0.002) and SLP (nerve fiber indicator [NFI]; 0.875; P=0.002) had higher AUC than that in CSLO (vertical cup/disc ratio; 0.720).ConclusionsThree instruments were useful in identifying GS and EG eyes. For glaucomatous eyes with or without early visual field defects, SLP and OCT performed similarly or had better discriminating abilities compared with CSLO.

[1]  H. Lemij,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of New GDx Parameters , 2004, Journal of glaucoma.

[2]  G A Cioffi,et al.  Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. Reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Drance,et al.  The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. , 1997, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[4]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[5]  A. Coleman,et al.  Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  R Ritch,et al.  Peripapillary Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement Reproducibility Using Scanning Laser Polarimetry , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[7]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[8]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  Assessment of optic disc anatomy and nerve fiber layer thickness in ocular hypertensive subjects with normal short-wavelength automated perimetry. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[9]  J Caprioli,et al.  Slope of the peripapillary nerve fiber layer surface in glaucoma. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  D. R. Anderson,et al.  The histology of retinal nerve fiber layer bundles and bundle defects. , 1979, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[12]  R. Weinreb,et al.  Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  J Caprioli,et al.  Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  A. Sommer,et al.  The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  G. Dunkelberger,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Jonas,et al.  Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Douglas Hoffman,et al.  Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  F W Fitzke,et al.  Variation of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  D. Broadway,et al.  A Comparison of Healthy, Ocular Hypertensive, and Glaucomatous Optic Disc Topographic Parameters , 1997, Journal of glaucoma.

[22]  N. Shimizu,et al.  Refractive errors and factors associated with myopia in an adult Japanese population. , 2003, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[24]  V. Parisi,et al.  Correlation between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials in open-angle glaucoma patients. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[25]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Aging on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography , 2003, Ophthalmologica.

[26]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  H A Quigley,et al.  Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  M Araie,et al.  Influence of myopic disc shape on the diagnostic precision of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. , 1999, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  H. Quigley,et al.  The size and shape of the optic disc in normal human eyes. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  M Diestelhorst,et al.  Optic nerve head morphometry in healthy adults using confocal laser scanning tomography , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[31]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.